1988
DOI: 10.1139/z88-243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of Trichinella pseudospiralis infection on the behaviour of captive, nonbreeding American kestrels (Falco sparverius)

Abstract: 1988. The influence of Tric*hinella pseudospiralis infection on the behaviour of captive, nonbreeding American kestrels (Falco sparverius) . Can. J. Zool . 66: 1685 -1692.Trichinella pseudospiralis infections induced mild behavioural changes in the American kestrel host (Falco sparverius) within the first 5 days postinoculation, a period that corresponds to the adult phase of the infection. However, more severe effects on mobility were precipitated as the larvae migrated and became established in the musculatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Host resistance due to either physiological barriers that impede infection or genetic resistance to blood parasites (Rytkönen et al 1996, Tourenq et al 2001) could explain the absence of blood parasites in a population. However, empirical evidence for such barriers or resistance is equivocal (e.g., Saumier et al 1988, Ricklefs 1992, Palacios and Martin 2006, Valera et al 2006, and our data do not permit examination of either of these possible explanations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Host resistance due to either physiological barriers that impede infection or genetic resistance to blood parasites (Rytkönen et al 1996, Tourenq et al 2001) could explain the absence of blood parasites in a population. However, empirical evidence for such barriers or resistance is equivocal (e.g., Saumier et al 1988, Ricklefs 1992, Palacios and Martin 2006, Valera et al 2006, and our data do not permit examination of either of these possible explanations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…In a study of male satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus , there was a positive correlation between intensities of the haemosporidian Haemoproteus and the amblyceran lice Myrsidea ptilonorhynchi (Borgia et al 2004). Experimental infections of Trichinella pseudospiralis in captive American kestrels Falco sparverius reduced the time hosts spent preening (Saumier et al 1988). Several of the endoparasites observed in the current study are capable of producing disease in their hosts (Holmstad et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most striking feature of these results is that the relationship between e¡ect size and the year of publication is contingent upon whether or not a parasiteinduced modi¢cation of host behaviour can be adaptive Bethel & Holmes (1973), (6) Moore (1983b), (7) Brown & Thompson (1986), (8) Moore et al (1994), (9) Daniels (1985), (10) Townson (1970), (11) WÏlker (1985), (12) Rowland & Lindsay (1986), (13) Benton & Pritchard (1990), (14) Moore & Lasswell (1986), (15) Vance (1996), (16) McNair & Timmons (1977), (17) Rau (1983), (18) Hay & Aitken (1984), (19) Saumier et al (1988), (20) Webster (1994), (21) Cox & Holland (1998), (22) Pearre (1979), (23) Lowenberger & Rau (1994), (24) Krause & Godin (1994), (25) Hurd & Fogo (1991), (26) Poulin et al (1992), (27) Robb & Reid (1996), (28) Pasternak et al (1995), (29) Wedekind & Milinski (1996) and (30) …”
Section: (A) Parasite-induced Changes In Host Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%