2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-022-09802-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Identity Faultlines on Employees’ Team Commitment: the Moderating Role of Inclusive Leadership and Team Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no consensus among researchers about the role of different faultlines in team outcomes. While most studies have affirmed the negative impact of social-category faultlines ( Qi et al, 2022 ), the relationship between information-based faultlines and team outcomes has shown variability, exhibiting positive ( Cooper et al, 2014 ), negative ( Jiang et al, 2012 ), and no linear ( Rupert et al, 2016 ). The effect of faultlines on team outcomes is also influenced by team type and attribute combination.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus among researchers about the role of different faultlines in team outcomes. While most studies have affirmed the negative impact of social-category faultlines ( Qi et al, 2022 ), the relationship between information-based faultlines and team outcomes has shown variability, exhibiting positive ( Cooper et al, 2014 ), negative ( Jiang et al, 2012 ), and no linear ( Rupert et al, 2016 ). The effect of faultlines on team outcomes is also influenced by team type and attribute combination.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… van de Brake & Berger (2023) andQi et al (2022) used latent profile analysis not as a primary element of their substantive inquiry but mostly as a methodological exploration. We considered these cases as somewhat unique and difficult to characterize as exploratory or confirmatory for the purpose of the current review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…如何缓解子群体间冲突, 从而有效实现团队合作, 成为组织当前亟需解决的现实问题。 现有研究表明, 子群体或子团队可能会对团 队运作产生不利影响 (Thatcher et al, 2003;Li & Hambrick, 2005;Rico et al, 2007;Chiu & Staples, 2013;Ellis et al, 2013;Hutzschenreuter & Horstkotte, 2013;Heidl et al, 2014;谢小云 等, 2012;陈帅, 2016;倪旭东, 季百乐, 2019; 孙玥璠 等, 2021)。 例如, 子群体的形成可能导致个体将自身归类于 不同的特定群体, 加剧了子群体之间的交流障碍, 进 而 阻 碍 团 队 有 效 合 作 (O' Leary & Mortensen, 2010;Ndofor et al, 2015;周建 等, 2015;Meyer et al, 2016)。 若子群体内部具备较高的凝聚力, 子 群体成员可能会出于维护子群体利益的群体目标 而损害团队的整体利益 (Bezrukova et al, 2009;谢小云 等, 2012)。中国情境下的管理者常常将其 "亲信"列入主要统治群体, 这些"亲信"经常为谋 取本派私利而引发公司或团队内部派系之间冲突 不断 (Chi, 1996;罗家德, 郑孟育, 2009)。因此, 探 究子群体消极影响的缓解机制也成为了理论研究 的重要议题。 针对如何有效整合与协调团队内子群体这一 问题, 已有研究从团队结构和情境特征等方面探讨 了子群体消极作用的调节机制 (Carton & Cummings, 2013;Homan et al, 2007;Bezrukova et al, 2009;Bezrukova et al, 2012;潘清泉 等, 2015;倪旭东, 季百乐, 2019)。例如, 通过干预子群体的数量、平 衡性和子群体强度来减少子群体的消极作用 (Gibson & Vermeulen, 2003;Cronin et al, 2011;Meyer et al, 2015; 陈慧 等, 2019)。近年来, 仅有零星研究开 始探讨特定领导风格对子群体消极影响的缓解作 用 (Chen et al, 2023), 例如包容性领导 (Du et al, 2021;Qi et al, 2022)…”
unclassified