2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06571-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of image quality on diagnostic performance of a machine learning–based fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of patient preparation with nitroglycerine and beta blockers may degrade image quality and diagnostic accuracy of cCTA and CT-FFR [ 35 , 36 ]. However, we found no association between recategorization to false positive ratings and quantitatively or qualitatively assessed image quality in our study ( Table 3 and Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of patient preparation with nitroglycerine and beta blockers may degrade image quality and diagnostic accuracy of cCTA and CT-FFR [ 35 , 36 ]. However, we found no association between recategorization to false positive ratings and quantitatively or qualitatively assessed image quality in our study ( Table 3 and Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the lack of the administration of nitrates or beta blockers may degrade image quality and consequently diagnostic accuracy of both cCTA and CT-FFR [ 35 , 36 ]. However, as only exams without morphological signs of obstructive CAD were included, no exams with insufficient image quality for the delineation of the coronary lumina were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, performance was substantially decreased in low-quality images vs. high-quality images, subjectively determined by expert readers (AUC: 0.80 vs. 0.93, respectively). 8 Moreover, in a multicentre study by Tesche et al . 14 , performance was also impacted by the CAC burden.…”
Section: Applications Of Machine Learning In Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 Moreover, the study by Xu et al . 8 demonstrated the effect of poor image quality and tachycardia on the performance of the algorithm. Indeed, performance was substantially decreased in low-quality images vs. high-quality images, subjectively determined by expert readers (AUC: 0.80 vs. 0.93, respectively).…”
Section: Applications Of Machine Learning In Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation