The influence of implant depth, abutment height and mucosal phenotype on peri‑implant bone levels: A 2-year clinical trial

Quispe-López, Norberto; Guadilla, Yasmina; Gómez-Polo, Cristina; López-Valverde, Nansi; Flores-Fraile, Javier; Montero, Javier

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105264

Journal of Dentistry

2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105264

|View full text |Cite

The influence of implant depth, abutment height and mucosal phenotype on peri‑implant bone levels: A 2-year clinical trial

Norberto Quispe-López,

Yasmina Guadilla,

Cristina Gómez-Polo

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Anitua,

Montalvillo,

Eguia

et al. 2024

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This randomized controlled split-mouth trial compared the performance of 5.5 mm length implants (test group; TG) splinted within the same fixed prosthesis as longer implants (≥6.5 mm; control group; CG) in posterior regions. Methods: The primary hypothesis was that implant length does not affect marginal bone loss (MBL) one year post-implantation, while the secondary hypotheses included implant survival, peri-implant clinical variables, and prosthetic complications. Fifteen patients (eight males, seven females) with a mean age of 67 ± 9 years were included. Results: No significant difference in the implant position between groups (p = 0.808) was observed. Implant diameters ranged from 3.00 to 4.25 mm, and the most common bone type was type I (67%). Bone density (p = 0.574) and implant insertion torque (p = 0.888) were similar between groups. Mesial MBL (mean: −0.1; range: −1.19 to 0.24 for TG, and −0.03; −1.75 to 0.45 for CG; p = 0.955) and distal MBL (mean: −0.05; range: −1.41 to 0.27 for TG, and 0.08; −1.45 to 0.72 for CG; p = 0.118) did not show statistical differences. There were no implant failures or technical complications. Conclusions: These findings suggest that 5.5 mm length implants could be a viable option for use in posterior regions, providing similar clinical outcomes to longer implants one year post-implantation.

show abstract

Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Anitua,

Montalvillo,

Eguia

et al. 2024

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The influence of implant depth, abutment height and mucosal phenotype on peri‑implant bone levels: A 2-year clinical trial

Cited by 1 publication

References 33 publications

Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Performance of Extra-Short (≤5.5 mm) Compared to Longer Implants Splinted under the Same Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About