2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00455-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of implant position on the wear of alumina-on-alumina studied in a hip simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A correct cup inclination is fundamental. 6,37,44,45 A too vertical position tends to increase the acetabular cup wear. Consequently, edge contacts may occur between the ball and the cup with a considerable increase in stress concentration on the cup edge and the following detachment of ceramic grains leading to a catastrophic wearing of the coupling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correct cup inclination is fundamental. 6,37,44,45 A too vertical position tends to increase the acetabular cup wear. Consequently, edge contacts may occur between the ball and the cup with a considerable increase in stress concentration on the cup edge and the following detachment of ceramic grains leading to a catastrophic wearing of the coupling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently published wear simulator studies performing edge load at MoP [22,98-100], CoP [101], CoC [98,102] and MoM [103] bearings are available in the literature. All of these studies used steep cup positions to achieve edge loading at the rim of the liner, disregarding microseparation effects (TABLE 4).…”
Section: Edge Loading Testing During Steep Cup Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient variables include age, sex, weight, general health and activity level. Multiple assessments of wear over time are more valuable than a single measurement and comparing rates of linear penetration after different durations of implantation may be difficult (Affatato et al, 2004;Manning et al, 2005). operative technique, biomechanical considerations, initial and long-term implant fixation) (Braunstein et al, 2009;Clarke and Manley, 2008).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%