2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of individual- and class-level fairness-related perceptions on student satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with what social and organizational psychologists have previously hypothesized in different social settings, 46 our results highlight the importance of fairness at school as a potential risk factor for early adolescent health. Further research is needed to disentangle the specific psychological and biological mechanisms and better explain the link between teacher unfairness and headache.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with what social and organizational psychologists have previously hypothesized in different social settings, 46 our results highlight the importance of fairness at school as a potential risk factor for early adolescent health. Further research is needed to disentangle the specific psychological and biological mechanisms and better explain the link between teacher unfairness and headache.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because to what extent the written and non-written rules will be applied in the school and what will be considered when applying these rules are related to the meaning and significance attached to these rules. While procedural justice focuses on the justice of the rules and procedures used in decision making (Wendorf & Alexander, 2005), distributive justice includes the appropriateness of the results of conflict resolution (Erkan, 2013). Interactional justice, which is the humanitarian side of the justice perception, is an essential aspect of justice in educational institutions (Schimdt, 2001).…”
Section: Results Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations of fairness have important consequences for student learning and behavior. Students' assessments of instructors' fairness affect students' satisfaction Facework and Feedback Quality 401 with their instructor (Wendorf & Alexander, 2005) and help form their implicit theories about teaching effectiveness (Harrison, Ryan, & Moore, 1996). Students' evaluations of fairness positively predict student motivation and affective learning (Chory-Assad, 2002) and negatively predict their indirect aggressiveness (ChoryAssad, 2002;Chory-Assad & Paulsel, 2004b) and expressions of hostility or negative resistance behaviors such as deception (Chory-Assad & Paulsel, 2004b).…”
Section: Fi Face-threat Mitigation and Fairness Of Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 98%