2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1019.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Initial Grain Size and Strain Sequence of Slab Hot Rolling on the Austenite Evolution of Peritectic Microalloyed Plate Steels

Abstract: The influence of the strain sequence during slab hot rolling (also known as “roughing”) on the evolution of austenite in plain carbon, C-Mn-V and C-Mn-Nb-Ti-V steels was investigated. Reheating and roughing simulations were conducted in a Bähr deformation dilatometer using a constant austenitising temperature, constant soaking time and various heating rates and roughing strain sequences. Stress analysis was used to quantify the austenite softening behaviour and the prior austenite grain size was measured from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3 show the austenite grain size a) after reheating, b) after roughing schedule I and c) after roughing schedule III for the C-Mn and Nb-Ti-V steels. The fine D 0 in the Nb-Ti-V steel is due to the grain boundary pinning effect of stable TiN precipitates [10]. Grain refinement is achieved in both steels after roughing in all schedules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 and 3 show the austenite grain size a) after reheating, b) after roughing schedule I and c) after roughing schedule III for the C-Mn and Nb-Ti-V steels. The fine D 0 in the Nb-Ti-V steel is due to the grain boundary pinning effect of stable TiN precipitates [10]. Grain refinement is achieved in both steels after roughing in all schedules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For a given schedule, the C-Mn steel is the coarsest due to a large D 0 which creates a relatively small S v and a large D rex . Comparison of the measured X f and D rex to predicted values from literature is made elsewhere [10]. Poor correlation was found for X f at ε app less than 0.15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation