2013
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2012.692730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Instructional Variables and Task Constraints on Handwriting Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two tests also add another level of analysis thanks to two conditions in the copy task: normal speed and maximum speed (the DASH [49]). This approach is particularly interesting, since it mimics certain classroom conditions, and it is well-known that adding constraints (temporal or spatial) during handwriting helps reveal handwriting deficits [62,63]. Combining different tasks and/or conditions can provide a fine and detailed analysis of handwriting.…”
Section: Handwriting Tools Based On the Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two tests also add another level of analysis thanks to two conditions in the copy task: normal speed and maximum speed (the DASH [49]). This approach is particularly interesting, since it mimics certain classroom conditions, and it is well-known that adding constraints (temporal or spatial) during handwriting helps reveal handwriting deficits [62,63]. Combining different tasks and/or conditions can provide a fine and detailed analysis of handwriting.…”
Section: Handwriting Tools Based On the Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ce sens, Graham et al (2006) ont montré que les enfants commettaient davantage d’erreurs pour la formation des lettres lors d’une tâche de rappel de l’alphabet que lors d’une tâche de copie ou d’une tâche de composition. Les meilleures performances observées à une tâche de copie comparativement à une tâche de rappel de l’alphabet ont également été observées dans le cadre d’une étude menée par Fitzpatrick, Vander Hart et Cortesa (2013). Ces résultats vont dans le sens de ceux obtenus par d’autres études qui ont montré que la nature ou la longueur des tâches d’écriture pouvait être mise en relation avec les performances graphomotrices ou orthographiques d’enfants d’âge primaire (Bonin, Méot, Lagarrigue et Roux, 2014; Chartrel et Vinter, 2006; Dennis et Swinth, 2001).…”
Section: L’évaluation De L’écriture Manuelleunclassified
“…In analysis, automated movement patterns show a smooth, regular velocity profile with only one velocity reversal per upward and downward stroke. Familiar patterns, allographs, and words are expected to be performed by older children and adults through this much more automated process (feed-forward control) [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Advanced handwriting fluency, in terms of increased stroke frequency and automaticity, has been shown to be an important prerequisite for speed in third and fourth graders [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%