The Influence of Interview Style on SIOs’ Responsiveness to the Suspect’s Alibi

Abstract

In criminal investigations, it may happen that the police will collect and use information that is actually incorrect. Making sure that such error is detected and corrected is part of the legal and operational burden placed on any investigating officer, but especially on the Senior Investigative Officer (SIO). This present study explored to what degree different interview styles will affect SIO decision-making, since interviewing witnesses and suspects is an important source of information for the police. A sample of 115 Dutch and Norwegian SIOs therefore performed an online vignette task. They read about a fictitious, but realistic case and received a report of an interview with the suspect. In this interview, the suspect had provided an alibi for one of the pieces of information that were disclosed to her and that actually was an incorrect piece of information. In the report the SIOs received, the interviewer either picked up the alibi (adaptive style), reacted indifferently to it (neutral) or discredited it right away (maladaptive). A significant effect was found for interview style being associated with SIOs’ responsiveness: the SIOs who read the adaptive or neutral interview report were significantly more responsive to the alibi than those who read the maladaptive report. The implications of this finding are discussed.

An analysis of interview strategies in high-stakes crime investigations in the UK: Are they fit for purpose?

“…The main area of concern identified at this strategy-stage phase related to SIO liaison. Ensuring appropriate suspect interviewing is an essential practice (Van Beek et al, 2022) and one that require consultation between the SIO and IM (Cook, 2019). In major investigations, the SIO retains overall accountability for all of the decisions made throughout the course of an investigation, even when decisions are made by other colleagues including the IM (Cook, 2019).…”