2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of juvenile justice workforce’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs on behaviors toward youth with diverse sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The searches were conducted on April 13, 2023, with seven publications being included upon final review (see Figure 1 ; Matarese et al., 2023 ). All articles received scores over 70% (agreed upon cut off) and were included in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The searches were conducted on April 13, 2023, with seven publications being included upon final review (see Figure 1 ; Matarese et al., 2023 ). All articles received scores over 70% (agreed upon cut off) and were included in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prison staff reported taking several factors into consideration in their interactions with incarcerated people, such as acknowledging that rapport building is of high importance in such an environment (Marlow et al., 2015 ). Knowledge was found to be directly correlated with demonstrating reported protective and supportive behaviors toward youth with diverse sexual orientations, gender identities, and expression (SOGIE; Matarese et al., 2023 ); behaviors that have also been shown to impact self-esteem and self-worth. Staff reported caution in their approach to ensure that offense is not caused with consideration given as to how incarcerated trans persons may perceive their actions (Marlow et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2017, the QIC-LGBTQ2S conducted a scoping review of the literature and evidence-based clearinghouses finding that there were only a few programs across the country developed for LGBTQ+ youth in care and none of them had a significant amount of evidence as to their effectiveness (Matarese et al, 2017). Five years later, in 2022, a search of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse (CBEC) rendered only 14 results when searching for “LGBTQ” programs, all of which are “not rated” due to a lack of evidence-base that meets CEBC criteria.…”
Section: The Lgbtq+ Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, children in care are disproportionately from poor and Black families and in care due to neglect (Anarida et al, 2018;Tornello, 2021a). Trans and nonbinary youth, however, are most often in care due to familial rejection, abuse, or conduct challenges related to their gender identities (Irvine & Canfield, 2016;Matarese et al, 2017;Perry & Green, 2017). The characteristics of youth in care may inform their needs when placed in an adoptive home.…”
Section: Youth In Foster Carementioning
confidence: 99%