2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of leader relational energy on employee cognitive well-being: A moderated mediation model

Abstract: To demonstrate how cognitive well-being effectively occurs, this study examines the interactive effects of relational energy on cognitive well-being. Based on conservation of resource (COR) theory, this study expands understanding of the relationship between leader relational energy and employee cognitive well-being, using 245 employees as the sample in the experiment of exploring the mediation role of work absorption. Meanwhile, the significance of co-worker relational energy is highlighted as a key boundary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical research on the cognitive well-being of employees has been well constructed within the domain of organizational studies [ 6 ]. Most prior research on cognitive well-being has constructed the domain of work life, life circumstances, and work absorption [ 12 , 66 , 67 ]. Some scholars have constructed cognitive well-being while focusing on the experience of life satisfaction (e.g., expected continuity and performance of the job) and job satisfaction (e.g., perceived and desired continuity of the job).…”
Section: Context and Theoretical Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research on the cognitive well-being of employees has been well constructed within the domain of organizational studies [ 6 ]. Most prior research on cognitive well-being has constructed the domain of work life, life circumstances, and work absorption [ 12 , 66 , 67 ]. Some scholars have constructed cognitive well-being while focusing on the experience of life satisfaction (e.g., expected continuity and performance of the job) and job satisfaction (e.g., perceived and desired continuity of the job).…”
Section: Context and Theoretical Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%