2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of limited English proficiency on outcome in patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Abstract: Objective To evaluate how limited English proficiency affects treatment outcome in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with curative intent radiation therapy (RT). Methods From 2004 to 2010, 131 patients with HNC underwent RT. Patient's self-reported primary language and race/ethnicity were obtained at hospital registration. English proficiency was categorized as being English proficient (EP) or limited English proficient (LEP). Race/ethnicity was categorized as white, black and other (Hispanics and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first examined the influence of limited English proficiency on outcome in 131 patients with head and neck cancer who were treated with RT. 33 In this study, the authors found that Hispanic-Americans and Asian-Americans (grouped together in analysis because of sample size limitations) were less likely to receive RT (60.9% vs. 84.7%; P = .038) than Caucasian patients. More importantly, patients with limited English proficiency were less likely to undergo chemoradiation (60% vs. 83.8%; P = .028) and had significantly lower 3-year actuarial locoregional control (58.3% vs. 82.2%; P = .038) than patients who were proficient in English, regardless of race or ethnicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first examined the influence of limited English proficiency on outcome in 131 patients with head and neck cancer who were treated with RT. 33 In this study, the authors found that Hispanic-Americans and Asian-Americans (grouped together in analysis because of sample size limitations) were less likely to receive RT (60.9% vs. 84.7%; P = .038) than Caucasian patients. More importantly, patients with limited English proficiency were less likely to undergo chemoradiation (60% vs. 83.8%; P = .028) and had significantly lower 3-year actuarial locoregional control (58.3% vs. 82.2%; P = .038) than patients who were proficient in English, regardless of race or ethnicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…More importantly, patients with limited English proficiency were less likely to undergo chemoradiation (60% vs. 83.8%; P = .028) and had significantly lower 3-year actuarial locoregional control (58.3% vs. 82.2%; P = .038) than patients who were proficient in English, regardless of race or ethnicity. 33 This finding is of marked significance for Hispanic-Americans because they may have a higher percentage of limited-proficiency English speakers than Caucasians or other underrepresented minorities, particularly if they recently emigrated to the United States.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because patients with cancer and limited English proficiency report inferior treatment outcomes, their ineligibility may have affected results. 47 Any potential underestimated illness severity allows for 2 possible effects. First, our identified symptom severity and frequency admission rate, hospital length of stay, and other variables related to severity potentially represent the lower bound of severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single study was found that retrospectively examined 131 patients from a single institution with biopsy-proven head and neck cancer (nonmetastatic, nonrecurrent) who completed curative-intent RT. 66 There were no statistically significant differences by race with regard to treatment intent, time from diagnosis to start of treatment, or treatment duration. 66 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“… 66 There were no statistically significant differences by race with regard to treatment intent, time from diagnosis to start of treatment, or treatment duration. 66 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%