2017
DOI: 10.18821/1681-3456-2017-16-1-25-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Magnetic Therapy and Naftalan Treatment on the Clinical Course of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With the Concomitant Bronchial Asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Involvement of adjacent systems and organs into a pathologic process determines diversity of clinical manifestation of a disease. Non-esophageal manifestations of GERD are commonly seen by cardiologists, ENT specialists, dentists [5][6][7][8][9]. Thus, GERD may rightly be called interdisciplinary problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Involvement of adjacent systems and organs into a pathologic process determines diversity of clinical manifestation of a disease. Non-esophageal manifestations of GERD are commonly seen by cardiologists, ENT specialists, dentists [5][6][7][8][9]. Thus, GERD may rightly be called interdisciplinary problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influence of low frequency magnetic therapy in a complex with local naphthalanum applications among GERD patients with сoncomitant bronchial asthma was investigated. Elaborated treatment course facilitated improvement of clinical manifestations of a disease, showed anti-inflammatory effect proved by decrease of eosinophils, fibrinogen, anti-inflammatory сytokines FHO-α and IL-1β in blood, normalization of physical features and microscopic сharacteristics of phlegm, improve of external breathing functional index [6]. Named studies reflected aspects related to clinical and functional state of esophagus and stomach; influence of physical factors on neurohumoral regulation of LES was not studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%