2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-00880-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of moisture content on coal deformation and coal permeability during coalbed methane (CBM) production in wet reservoirs

Abstract: Moisture adsorption in the coal seams affects the gas adsorption capacity and can alter the coal deformation and permeability criteria of the coal seam. The effect of dynamic loss of moisture content, both on moisture and gas sorption-induced coal swelling/shrinkage strains, during the coalbed methane (CBM) production, is crucial. This study investigates the interactions among coal matrix, absorbed gas, and moisture content, based on the coal swelling/shrinkage strains and gas adsorption decay criteria. Conseq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This affects the heat rate performance of the thermal power plants. Talapatra et al [26] state that moisture content present in the coal affects the combustion process and reduces the efficiency of coal. The identified challenges with descriptions and the relevant references are provided in Table 1.…”
Section: The Challenges Affecting the Heat Rate Of Thermal Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This affects the heat rate performance of the thermal power plants. Talapatra et al [26] state that moisture content present in the coal affects the combustion process and reduces the efficiency of coal. The identified challenges with descriptions and the relevant references are provided in Table 1.…”
Section: The Challenges Affecting the Heat Rate Of Thermal Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building out a fully cross‐coupled model of coal gas‐moisture relationships for CBM production prediction is crucial. Recognizing this, some recent studies have considered the influences of moisture content and rank on sorption‐induced coal deformation 21,22 . However, there are still insufficient data currently available for making quantitative analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to distinguishing the difference of the WVA process between pores and fractures, Sun et al also distinguished hydrophobic organic pores and hydrophilic inorganic pores in shale, and they believed that the pores in organic matter can be simplified as a cylindrical pore model. Several experimental studies have been carried out to show that the presence of water in coal can significantly affect CBM production, − and some researchers attribute that the water occurrence caused CBM production decline to the water blocking effect. , To date, research on the water blocking effect is relatively mature, but there is a lack of research on water blocking caused by WVA. Especially, for nanopore-rich coal, WVA is more easily to cause capillary condensation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%