The Influence of Multiple Introduced Predators on a Littoral Pond Community

Abstract

In a replicated field experiment we studied the effects of natural densities of two exotic consumers, the predatory and herbivorous signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) and the predatory rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), on multiple trophic levels of a pond community. The goals were to: (1) determine the individual and combined effects of predators on macroinvertebrates, macrophytes, and periphytic algae; (2) evaluate the strength of direct and indirect interactions in a food web influenced by omnivores; and (3) evaluate the relative importance of direct and indirect predator effects on mortality and growth of a native frog species, Rana temporaria. The experiment showed that both signal crayfish and rainbow trout had strong effects on multitrophic levels of a littoral pond community, through direct consumption and indirect effects on lower trophic levels. Crayfish had weak but significant negative effects on the biomass of predatory invertebrates and greatly reduced the biomass of snails, the most abundant invertebrate grazers. Although the number of active herbivorous tadpoles tended to be higher in crayfish cages relative to control cages, the proportion of surviving froglets was lower in crayfish cages than in control cages, possibly due to crayfish predation on injured tadpoles. The size of surviving froglets did not differ from controls, but tadpoles in crayfish cages often suffered tail injuries. Macrophyte coverage decreased as a result of crayfish consumption and nonconsumptive fragmentation. However, the biomass of periphyton increased in crayfish cages relative to controls, probably due to reduced grazing from snails. In contrast, trout had strong negative effects on the biomass of both predatory invertebrates and insect grazers, whereas trout had less effect on snail biomass than did crayfish. Also, in contrast to crayfish cages, the number of active tadpoles in trout cages was lower than in controls, probably due to a combination of trout predation and trout‐induced reduced tadpole activity. Trout had a strong negative impact on froglet survival, and froglets in trout cages metamorphosed at a smaller size and had reduced growth rates compared to froglets in crayfish and control cages. As with crayfish, the biomass of periphyton increased in trout cages relative to controls, which may be due to a combination of both density and trait‐mediated trout effects on tadpole grazing. In treatments with multiple predators the effects of crayfish and trout on caged communities were independent, and there were few interactions. Mostly effects of combined predators reflected those in single predator cages. Our results demonstrate that noninteracting, introduced multiple predators can have strong direct and indirect effects on multiple trophic levels in pond communities. Trophic cascades may develop in aquatic food webs even with omnivores such as crayfish, and in complex habitats with trout. These strong indirect effects are mediated through both predation on important grazers (i.e., the crayfish–snail–pe...

Comparing the ecological impacts of native and invasive crayfish: could native species’ translocation do more harm than good?

“…These results show that introduced across Europe, where impacts upon aquatic flora and fauna have been extensively documented (e.g. Unestam and Weiss 1970;Nyström et al 2001;Stenroth and Nyström 2003;Bubb et al 2006;Olden et al 2006;Bubb et al 2009;Axelsson et al 1997).…”

“…Both native and invasive crayfish can affect plant and animal communities through predation (e.g. Charlebois and Lamberti 1996;Axelsson et al 1997;Parkyn et al 1997;Nyström et al 2001;Dorn and Mittelbach 2004;Usio and Townsend 2004;McCarthy et al 2006;Jackson et al 2014;Moorhouse et al 2014), demonstrated by their consistently strong negative effects on plant biomass, other macroinvertebrates, fish and amphibian eggs and larvae. Additionally, crayfish are likely to directly compete with other organisms for resources (Bubb et al 2009).…”

“…Indeed the current study provides some evidence of resource competition in finding that the refuge use of fish was significantly lower in the presence of invasive, but not native, crayfish. These direct effects of crayfish on individual ecosystem components may have indirect consequences on other aquatic organisms through trophic cascades (Nyström et al 2001). For example, by reducing aquatic plant biomass, crayfish reduce the availability of refuges to macro-invertebrates and fish, which may indirectly benefit higher trophic levels (such as predatory fish, birds and otters) by increasing prey vulnerability.…”

“…Various studies report that crayfish-induced reductions in invertebrate densities are associated with increases in primary productivity (e.g. Charlebois and Lamberti 1996; Nyström et al 2001;Bobeldyk and Lamberti 2010). This would be expected as crayfish are known to prey heavily upon algivorous snails (Lodge et al 1994;Parkyn et al 1997;Nyström et al 2001;Bjurström 2009), thereby releasing algae from grazing pressure and facilitating primary production.…”

The long-term effects of invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on instream macroinvertebrate communities

“…Studies documenting the effect of invasive crayfish in stream ecosystems have identified significant reductions in the biomass and richness of aquatic macrophytes Nyström et al, 2001), and aquatic invertebrates Stenroth and Nyström, 2003;Crawford et al, 2006;Nilsson et al, 2012;Ercoli et al, 2015b).…”