2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of nanosecond laser pulse energy density for paint removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several parameters must be considered during the coating removal process, which are laser wavelength (λ), laser fluence (F), pulse width (PW), and repetition rate (RR) (Brygo et al, 2006). Inappropriate selection of laser parameters may lead to overexposure, which may result in metal substrate damage due to the high energy density of the laser beam, whereas underexposure can leave residual contaminations on the surface of the substrate (Lee & Watkins, 2000;Li, Zhang, Zhou, Zhu, & Liu, 2018). However, the damage to the substrate material can be eliminated by applying optimum operational laser parameters without external distraction during the cleaning process (Han et al, 2017;Heidelmann, 2011).…”
Section: Laser Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several parameters must be considered during the coating removal process, which are laser wavelength (λ), laser fluence (F), pulse width (PW), and repetition rate (RR) (Brygo et al, 2006). Inappropriate selection of laser parameters may lead to overexposure, which may result in metal substrate damage due to the high energy density of the laser beam, whereas underexposure can leave residual contaminations on the surface of the substrate (Lee & Watkins, 2000;Li, Zhang, Zhou, Zhu, & Liu, 2018). However, the damage to the substrate material can be eliminated by applying optimum operational laser parameters without external distraction during the cleaning process (Han et al, 2017;Heidelmann, 2011).…”
Section: Laser Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well reported, many factors including but not limited to the pulse frequency, the scanning line interval, the scanning speed and the laser fluence are able to affect the efficiency of laser cleaning [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. According to Zhao et al, the energy incorporated in each single pulse increased as the pulse frequency decreased, which would potentially trigger the plasma shielding effect near the painting layer surface once the pulse energy reached to a certain value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zhao et al, the energy incorporated in each single pulse increased as the pulse frequency decreased, which would potentially trigger the plasma shielding effect near the painting layer surface once the pulse energy reached to a certain value. Of particular note, this resulting plasma shielding effect has a potential to cause the recession phenomenon through absorbing the energy involved in lasers and accordingly, hinders the further cleaning effectiveness to the painting layer [17][18][19]. Besides, the larger scanning line interval was reported to decrease the corresponding cleaning efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent technology era, laser cleaning is highefficient and newly emerging environmentally-friendly technology. This technology can be widely applied to many fields, such as cleaning electronic elements, removing oil dirt, and painting [1,2]. Therefore, paint removal by laser technique, where the laser parameter is a key factor that decides the paint removal efficiency of the surface cleaning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%