2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(99)00206-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of naturally occurring heterophilic anti-immunoglobulin antibodies on direct measurement of serum proteins using sandwich ELISAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The peptide standard refers to the 13 separated by LC retention time as well. In contrast, autoantibodies and heterophilic anti-reagent antibodies are known to produce false positive and false negative results in sandwich immunoassays (33)(34)(35). These types of interferences are not observed in immuno-MRM-MS because the auto-and heterophilic antibodies are inactivated by reduction, alkylation, and enzymatic digestion during sample preparation for SISCAPA (36 -38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peptide standard refers to the 13 separated by LC retention time as well. In contrast, autoantibodies and heterophilic anti-reagent antibodies are known to produce false positive and false negative results in sandwich immunoassays (33)(34)(35). These types of interferences are not observed in immuno-MRM-MS because the auto-and heterophilic antibodies are inactivated by reduction, alkylation, and enzymatic digestion during sample preparation for SISCAPA (36 -38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this multiplex assay has been set up as a sandwich immunoassay, it will enhance specificity and reduce the risk of cross-recognition with other proteins (7). Hence, specificity could be increased when additional antibodies are added to the multiplex assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experience before the surge in therapeutic use of murine or humanized murine monoclonal antibodies, we found little evidence of interfering immunoglobulins from the immunoglobulin classes that normally exhibit higher affinities, i.e., IgA or IgG (personal observation). Low-affinity human antibodies often bind to both animal and human immunoglobulins, making heterophilic antibodies (human anti-animal) and rheumatoid factors (human anti-human) overlapping and sometimes confusing entities (4 ). Such antibodies do not form complexes in vivo, although they bind the stacked capture antibodies on the solid phase in immunometric assays.…”
Section: The War On Heterophilic Antibody Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%