2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03526.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of neighbourhood deprivation on the prevalence of diabetes in 25‐ to 74‐year‐old individuals: first results from the Dortmund Health Study

Abstract: Diabet. Med. 29, 831–833 (2012)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Private health care is expensive and the result is a neglect of most medical non-emergencies. The authors of two other studies reach similar conclusions, linking the diabetes prevalence to regional social and economic factors including unemployment [19,20]. They observed higher diabetes prevalence with increasing unemployment rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Private health care is expensive and the result is a neglect of most medical non-emergencies. The authors of two other studies reach similar conclusions, linking the diabetes prevalence to regional social and economic factors including unemployment [19,20]. They observed higher diabetes prevalence with increasing unemployment rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…[35][36][37][38][39][40][41] This reinforces the notion that deprived neighborhoods have distinct effects on health and care delivery and underscores the importance of using geography as a lens through which to view population health. Although imperfect, we provide a reproducible, practical, and feasible method for integrating community data into EHRs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The baseline assessment was conducted in 2003/2004, and 2291 participants (response proportion 67%), aged 25 to 74 years and living in one of 62 statistical districts of the city of Dortmund, Germany, either filled out a mailed questionnaire ( N = 979) on socio-economic status and subjective health, or attended the study centre ( N = 1312) to answer these questions in face-to-face interviews and receive a medical examination. For more details see [ 19 , 20 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%