2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00452.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of neighbourhood disadvantage on smoking cessation and its contribution to inequalities in smoking status

Abstract: Fundamentally, social and economic inequalities at the neighbourhood and individual levels cause smoking and cessation inequalities. Reducing these inequalities will require comprehensive, well-funded and targeted tobacco control efforts and equity-based policies that address the social and economic determinants of smoking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the general finding that disadvantaged neighborhoods are associated with significantly greater probability of smoking in a middle-aged Australian population and reduced likelihood of smoking cessation over time (Turrell, Hewitt, & Miller, 2012). However, some neighborhood characteristics that might be considered to be disadvantageous had protective effects for smoking behavior among mothers ages 15–25 (neighborhoods with more unemployment) and mothers ages 36+ (neighborhoods with more poverty and female-headed households).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the general finding that disadvantaged neighborhoods are associated with significantly greater probability of smoking in a middle-aged Australian population and reduced likelihood of smoking cessation over time (Turrell, Hewitt, & Miller, 2012). However, some neighborhood characteristics that might be considered to be disadvantageous had protective effects for smoking behavior among mothers ages 15–25 (neighborhoods with more unemployment) and mothers ages 36+ (neighborhoods with more poverty and female-headed households).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Those living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods also exhibit less healthy behaviours and worse outcomes, independent of their individual-level socioeconomic position (SEP) 7 8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, lower socioeconomic home environments are more likely to have current smokers and fewer smoking bans in the household (Muilenburg et al, 2009; Zhang, Martinez-Donate, Kuo, Jones, & Palmersheim, 2012). There is also increased smoking and less likelihood of TC in community and public environments that are considered lower income areas (Cohen, Sonderman, Mumma, Signorello, & Blot, 2011; Turrell, Hewitt, & Miller, 2012). In addition to environmental and social exposure to tobacco, there is also greater access to tobacco products in these low-income areas (Loomis, Kim, Goetz, & Juster, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%