2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of nociceptive and neuropathic pain states on the processing of acute electrical nociceptive stimulation: A dynamic causal modeling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 69 , 70 Non-invasive brain stimulation of the DLPFC can reduce somatosensory cortical excitability in sustained pain, 71 and a dynamic causal model of pain processing found an additional forward and backward connection between S1 and right DLPFC in chronic pain but not HCs, which they proposed could reflect increased attention to and catastrophizing of pain. 72 Although we did not find any correlation of the S1-DLPFC FC with symptom or pain scores pre-operatively, it is possible that such a relationship may exist with other individual factors such as pain catastrophizing. Therefore, it is possible that enhanced S1-DLPFC FC before surgery reflects greater attention to abnormal sensory signals from the hand.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“… 69 , 70 Non-invasive brain stimulation of the DLPFC can reduce somatosensory cortical excitability in sustained pain, 71 and a dynamic causal model of pain processing found an additional forward and backward connection between S1 and right DLPFC in chronic pain but not HCs, which they proposed could reflect increased attention to and catastrophizing of pain. 72 Although we did not find any correlation of the S1-DLPFC FC with symptom or pain scores pre-operatively, it is possible that such a relationship may exist with other individual factors such as pain catastrophizing. Therefore, it is possible that enhanced S1-DLPFC FC before surgery reflects greater attention to abnormal sensory signals from the hand.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…2. 2) FC-PC: This is the most frequent effective connectivity category in the literatures, with 80 publications [4], [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], [18][19][20], [21][22][23][24], [27][28][29], [31][32], [34], [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], [46], [55][56][57] , [62 ] , [67 ] , [71 -74 ] , [76][77], [79], [81][82][83], , [107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11) FC-INS: Nine papers, [31], [35], [63], [72], [80], [111], [129], [132], [146], involved in this connectivity category, with a heterogeneous set of task types (please refer to Fig. 2 for more details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a recent EEG study measured the brain responses to nociceptive stimulation and revealed significant differences in coupling strengths between patients with nociceptive and neuropathic etiologies. Their findings provided positive evidence for finding potential neuroimaging biomarkers of cLBP subtypes (Goudman et al, 2020). We believe that dynamic FC has the potential to provide new biomarkers in future studies in FBSS, better patient selections for SCS treatments, and/or the mechanisms of SCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%