2020
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000682500.56692.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence Of Normalization Technique On Between-muscle Activation During A Back-squat: Methodological Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we used the fourth-order Butterworth high-pass filter (cutoff frequency of 40 Hz) to filter the signal and then removed the means and rectification ( Myers et al, 2003 ). Then, we used the fourth-order Butterworth low-pass filter (cutoff frequency of 4 Hz) to extract the signal envelope and introduced the maximum normalization method ( Esmaeili and Maleki, 2019 ; Korak et al, 2020 ) to normalize each channel EMG data for every trial according to the maximum amplitude value in each channel. We preprocessed all signals for each movement according to the above methods and built a data matrix of L × K ( L was the number of muscles, K was the number of data points), which was set as the muscle activation matrix M .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used the fourth-order Butterworth high-pass filter (cutoff frequency of 40 Hz) to filter the signal and then removed the means and rectification ( Myers et al, 2003 ). Then, we used the fourth-order Butterworth low-pass filter (cutoff frequency of 4 Hz) to extract the signal envelope and introduced the maximum normalization method ( Esmaeili and Maleki, 2019 ; Korak et al, 2020 ) to normalize each channel EMG data for every trial according to the maximum amplitude value in each channel. We preprocessed all signals for each movement according to the above methods and built a data matrix of L × K ( L was the number of muscles, K was the number of data points), which was set as the muscle activation matrix M .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pilot session was conducted to assess the acceleration signals during the exercise, leading to the identification of an initial peak corresponding to the initiation of the exercise repetition and another peak observed at the conclusion of the exercise repetition. The RMS sEMG data were expressed as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) [ 12 ] utilizing the highest sEMG recorded during the resisted plyometric without jumping trials at 5 cm/s [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such method is to compare the sEMG signal magnitude during a functional activity to that of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) [7]. While this is a well-known normalization method, true subject effort has been shown to impact the validity of the results [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such method is to compare the sEMG signal magnitude during a functional activity to that of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) [7]. While this is a well-known normalization method, true subject effort has been shown to impact the validity of the results [8,9]. Mechanomyography (MMG), a methodology for assessing the mechanical activity of muscle during contraction, has recently gained attention as a counterpart or alternative to EMG [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%