2020
DOI: 10.1002/icd.2210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of parental warmth and stress on reading through approaches to learning: Racial/ethnic variation

Abstract: When identifying parental socialization processes influencing children's reading achievement, building self‐regulation is a potential underlying mechanism. Yet socialization (i.e., warmth, stress) of self‐regulation may vary based on the sociocultural context of ethnic minority families. Using the ECLS‐K: 2011 (N = 17,020; MAge = 73.43 mos, SD = 4.48 mos), we explored: (RQ1) Do kindergarten approaches to learning (ATL), a composite of self‐regulation behaviours in the classroom context, mediate the association… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(144 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Authoritative parenting can not only directly related to children’s early academic skills, but also indirectly related to pre-academic skills via ATL. This result supports Hill and Palacios’ (2020) study with Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K) 2011 longitudinal data, which found that parents’ warmth and support helps promote children’s ATL, which in turn facilitates children’s acquisition of reading skills. Authoritative parenting characterized by warmth and support, reasoning guidance, and democratic participation helps to create a positive and democratic family atmosphere, which is conducive to children’s development of ATL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Authoritative parenting can not only directly related to children’s early academic skills, but also indirectly related to pre-academic skills via ATL. This result supports Hill and Palacios’ (2020) study with Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K) 2011 longitudinal data, which found that parents’ warmth and support helps promote children’s ATL, which in turn facilitates children’s acquisition of reading skills. Authoritative parenting characterized by warmth and support, reasoning guidance, and democratic participation helps to create a positive and democratic family atmosphere, which is conducive to children’s development of ATL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Respondents rate each item on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from "almost always true" to "almost never true." The tool's validity and reliability have been confirmed through numerous studies across diverse cultural contexts, demonstrating robust psychometric properties and consistent results in assessing parental warmth and rejection (Hill & Palacios, 2020;Jaggers et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2018;Operario et al, 2005;Schiff et al, 2017;Shelleby & Ogg, 2019;Xu & Zheng, 2022;Yeo et al, 2022).…”
Section: Parental Warmthmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The association between parental warmth and family stress is complex, with each influencing the other in significant ways. High levels of family stress can diminish parents' capacity to provide warmth, while a warm and supportive family environment can buffer the negative effects of stress (Hill & Palacios, 2020;Schulz et al, 2023). This bidirectional relationship underscores the need for interventions that simultaneously address both parental warmth and family stress to promote healthier family dynamics and better developmental outcomes for children and adolescents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This four-item index has been adopted by multiple nationally representative surveys such as the National Surveys of American Families and the National Surveys of Children’s Health and was proven to be a valid measure of parental stress (Blumberg et al 2005; Macomber and Moore 1997). The index has also been widely used in previous parental stress studies with Cronbach’s alpha scores ranging between .50 and .70 (for example, Hill and Palacios 2021; S. J. Lee et al 2018; Nomaguchi and House 2013; Yu and Singh 2012), a range that includes the Cronbach’s alpha in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%