The Influence of Personal Factor, Husband’s support, Health Workers and Peers toward the Use of IVA Screening among Women of Reproductive Age in the Regency of Karanganyar

Wakhidah, Martini Shoim; Hastuti, Uki Retno Budi; Dewi, Yulia Lanti Retno

doi:10.26911/thejhpb.2017.02.02.03

Cited by 4 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(3 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A majority of the studies (n = 81) were cross-sectional or case-control studies, while the rest were qualitative (n = 9) or mixedmethods (n = 3) studies. Most of the studies were conducted in Malaysia (35.5%, n = 33) , followed by Thailand (24.7%, n = 23) , Indonesia (16.1%, n = 15) [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85], and Singapore (15.1%, n = 14) [86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99]. None of the studies were conducted in the Philippines and Timor-Leste.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

Chua

Ma²,

Asjes³

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Southeast Asia, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Low coverage for cervical cancer screening (CCS) becomes a roadblock to disease detection and treatment. Existing reviews on CCS have limited insights into the barriers and facilitators for SEA. Hence, this study aims to identify key barriers and facilitators among women living in SEA. A systematic literature review was conducted on Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. Primary qualitative and quantitative studies published in English that reported barriers and facilitators to CCS were included. The Mix Methods Appraisal Tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. Among the 93 included studies, pap smears (73.1%) were the most common screening modality. A majority of the studies were from Malaysia (35.5%). No studies were from Timor-Leste and the Philippines. The most common barriers were embarrassment (number of articles, n = 33), time constraints (n = 27), and poor knowledge of screening (n = 27). The most common facilitators were related to age (n = 21), receiving advice from healthcare workers (n = 17), and education status (n = 11). Findings from this review may inform health policy makers in developing effective cervical cancer screening programs in SEA countries.

show abstract

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

Chua

Ma²,

Asjes³

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Twenty-three articles reported on studies conducted on the island of Java, indicating the historical bias toward what is known as 'inner Indonesia' [32]. Most articles reported studies that were conducted in urban settings (n = 23), two articles reported on studies that were conducted in peri-urban setting [33,34] and six articles reported on studies that took place in a rural setting [35][36][37][38][39][40]. Two articles discussed studies in Yogyakarta and Central Java were undertaken in both rural and urban communities [41,42].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One article reported on a study that recruited participants via a hospital in Jakarta [31]. Four articles discussed studies that were conducted in a community setting [33,40,56,57], one in a workplace setting [58] and remaining articles reported on studies (n = 11) that did not specify the types of research sites where data was collected [23,35,37,38,41,42,[59][60][61][62][63].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The majority of included articles (n = 25) discussed facilitators and barriers [22,23,33,34,36,[39][40][41][42][44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52][54][55][56][57][58]60,61,63], two articles explored barriers exclusively [31,59] and seven articles focused only on facilitators [35,37,38,43,49,53,62]. Articles exploring the demand-side of CC screening predominately focused on women, with 29 articles reporting on studies having women participants only.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two included articles discussed supply-side facilitators [ 39 , 44 ], 19 articles discussed demand-side facilitators [ 34–36 , 43 , 45 , 46 , 48–50 , 52 , 54–58 , 60–63 ], and eleven discussed demand and supply-side facilitators [ 22 , 23 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 40–42 , 47 , 51 , 53 ]. Table 2 provides an overview of the identified themes within the included literature.…”

Section: Facilitators Of CC Uptake and Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Facilitators and barriers for the delivery and uptake of cervical cancer screening in Indonesia: a scoping review

Robbers

Bennett

Spagnoletti

et al. 2021

Global Health Action

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most common female cancer. In Indonesia, national CC screening coverage is low at 12%, highlighting the need to investigate facilitators and barriers to screening. Objective This review synthesises research on facilitators and barriers to the delivery and uptake of CC screening; analyses them in terms of supply- and demand-side factors and their interconnectedness; and proposes recommendations for further research. Methods Medline Ovid, CINAHL, Global Health, Neliti, SINTA and Google Scholar were searched, applying a search string with keywords relevant to screening, CC and Indonesia. In total 34 records were included, all were publications on CC screening in Indonesia (2000-2020) in English or Indonesian. Records were analysed to identify findings relevant to the categories of barriers and facilitators, supply-and demand-side factors. Results Demand-side facilitators identified included: husband, family or social/peer support (14 studies); information availability, knowledge and awareness (12 studies); positive attitudes and strong perception of screening benefit and the seriousness of CC (12 studies); higher education and socioeconomic status (11 studies); having health insurance; and short distance to screening services (4 studies). Evidence on supply-side was limited. Supply-side facilitators included counselling and support (6 studies), and ease of access (6 studies). Demand-side barriers identified focused on: lack of knowledge/awareness and lack of confidence in screening (14 studies); fear, fatalism and shame (10 studies); time and transportation constraints (8 studies); and lack of husband approval and support (6 studies). Supply-side barriers included: lack of skilled screening providers (3 studies); lack of advocacy and health promotion (3 studies); resource constraints (3 studies); and lack of supervision and support for health care providers (3 studies). Conclusions Facilitators and barriers were mirrored in the supply- and demand-side findings. The geographical scope and population diversity of existing research is limited and further supply-side research is urgently needed.

show abstract

Path Analysis on the Determinants of Visual Inspection Acetic Acid Utilization on Early Detection of Cervical Cancer: Application of Health Belief Model Theory

Sunarta

Sulaeman

Budihastuti³

2019

J HEALTH PROMOT BEHAV

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cervical cancer was a serious health problem for women and VIA screening provided many benefits to women, which was to detect early cervical cancer. This study aimed to determine the determinants that influence the use of VIA with the theory of Health Belief Model on women of reproductive age. Subjects and Method: This was an analytic observational study with a case-control approach, conducted in the working area of Wongsorejo Public Health Center, Banyuwangi, East Java from March to April 2019. The sampling technique used was Fixed Disease Sampling, with a ratio of 1:3. Samples from 150 women reproductive age who had not used VIA screening and 50 women who had conducted VIA screening. Independent variables were perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, cues to action, self-efficacy, knowledge, attitudes, access to services and husband's support. The dependent variable was the use of VIA. Data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by path analysis. Results: The use of VIA screening was directly affected and has a positive effect on perceived vulnerability (b= 1.45; CI 95%= 0.50 to 2.40; p= 0.003), perceived severity (b= 0.86; CI 95%= -0.16 to 1.88; p= 0.099), perceived benefit (b= 1.61; CI 95%= 0.52 to 2.68; p= 0.003), cues to action (b= 1.21; CI 95%= 0.05 to 2.37; p= 0.040), high efficacy (b= 1.26; CI 95%= 0.27 to 2.26; p= 0.012), attitude (b= 1.83; CI 95%= 0.81 up to 2.85) and husband support (b= 1.59; CI 95%= 0.63 to 2.55). The use of VIA screening was indirectly influenced by access to health services and knowledge. Conclusion:The use of VIA screening was directly influenced by perceived vulnerability, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to act, self-efficacy, attitude and husband support. And it was indirectly influenced by access to services and knowledge.

show abstract

The Influence of Personal Factor, Husband’s support, Health Workers and Peers toward the Use of IVA Screening among Women of Reproductive Age in the Regency of Karanganyar

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

Facilitators and barriers for the delivery and uptake of cervical cancer screening in Indonesia: a scoping review

Path Analysis on the Determinants of Visual Inspection Acetic Acid Utilization on Early Detection of Cervical Cancer: Application of Health Belief Model Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About