1970
DOI: 10.1080/1355800700070301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Personality and Task Conditions on Learning and Transfer

Abstract: To test hypotheses about the optimal place of rules in school learning tasks 124 12-year-old children from a single campus were categorised by ability, sex and two personality traits --extraversion/introversion and general anxiety. The learning task was a program on vectors from which rules were 'abstracted and given either before or after sections of the program containing practice examples.Further evidence for the superiority of rules following practice was obtained. Significant interactions of treatments an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It wau considered that the teaching provided by the structured strategy might favour results on a test of recall while the unstructured strategy might favour the learning of problem-solving, although these hypotheses were considered tentative as earlier evidence was conflicting. k i t h and Trown (1970) found no interaction between strategy and learning outcome while Worthen (1 968), also working in mathematics, found that unstructured teaching favoured retention and transfer while structured teaching favoured recall. In contrast Rowel1 et al (1969) suggested that structured teaching favoured recall, retention and transfer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It wau considered that the teaching provided by the structured strategy might favour results on a test of recall while the unstructured strategy might favour the learning of problem-solving, although these hypotheses were considered tentative as earlier evidence was conflicting. k i t h and Trown (1970) found no interaction between strategy and learning outcome while Worthen (1 968), also working in mathematics, found that unstructured teaching favoured retention and transfer while structured teaching favoured recall. In contrast Rowel1 et al (1969) suggested that structured teaching favoured recall, retention and transfer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k i t h and Bossett (1967) compared organised arrangement +underlying principle given + answer given (structured) with random arrangement (Unstructured). Leith and Trown (1970) compared rules before practice (structured) with rules after practice (unstructured). Two experiments carried out by the present author demonstrate some of the problems raised by differences between the variables of related experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%