An important application that benefits from the tuneability of band gaps in molecular semiconductors is the use of organic photovoltaics (OPV) for indoor light harvesting. The market of the internet of things (IoT) is emerging remarkably and demands to drive high amounts of off-grid low power consumption devices. [8][9][10][11][12][13] The possibility to produce solution-based, lowcost, and flexible solar foils makes OPV a good candidate to fulfill this demand. Furthermore, the absorption spectra of the active materials can be tuned chemically to match different light sources.Although efficiencies for indoor organic photovoltaics (iOPV) and other emerging indoor photovoltaics (iPV) technologies such as halide perovskites [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] or dye-sensitized solar cells [44][45][46][47][48][49][50] have improved substantially, it is hard to quantify progress and determine champion solar cells due to a lack of standardized comparison methods. [12,51,52] Different authors use different conditions to evaluate the performance of their devices. The set-ups differ in the illuminance value (ranging typically from 200 to 1000 lux) and the source of light, namely light emitting diodes (LED) or fluorescent lamps (FL) with varying emission spectra and color temperatures. This makes it difficult to compare devices and regularly leads to the publication of tables or figures where data is compared for different input spectra and illuminances. [43,53,54] The exact spectrum and intensity are, however, more than just a minor inconvenience for data comparison but can have a major impact on the output power at a given illuminance and the efficiency. This is due to several reasons. First, the presence of shunts [55][56][57] can have a substantial effect on the dependence of open-circuit voltage and fill factor on the light intensity under indoor conditions. [55,56,58] Second, the short-circuit current at a given illuminance strongly depends on the overlap of the materials' absorption spectra and the spectral emission power of the light source. [53,59] The exact spectrum is even more critical than for outdoor illumination, because indoor light sources have much more narrow spectra with strong emission between wavelengths of 400 and 700 nm [60,61] as compared to the air mass 1.5 global (AM1.5G) spectrum.In the worst-case scenario, an otherwise well-performing solar cell could exhibit low efficiencies if the color temperature of the light source is not suitable to the specific absorber bandgap. Standardizing indoor spectra as done for outdoor efficiency measurements is not practical given the substantial spectral differences between the used light sources. Furthermore, With increasing efficiencies of non-fullerene acceptor-based organic solar cells, thin-film technology is becoming a promising candidate for indoor light harvesting applications. However, the lack of standardized comparison methods makes it difficult to quantify progress and to compare indoor performance. Herein, a simple method to calculate the efficiency ...