The influence of physicians on colorectal cancer screening behavior

Ho, Maria Yi; Lai, Jennifer Y.; Cheung, Winson Y.

doi:10.1007/s10552-011-9842-4

Cited by 19 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another key component is the quality of the communication between the health care provider and patient. High-quality communication has been significantly positively correlated with increased colorectal cancer screening participation (Carcaise-Edinboro & Bradley, 2008; Ho, Lai, & Cheung, 2011). Increased time spent with the provider has been correlated with higher cancer screening participation levels (Carcaise-Edinboro & Bradley, 2008; Ho et al, 2011).…”

Section: Literature Review and Empirical And/or Theoretical Support Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…High-quality communication has been significantly positively correlated with increased colorectal cancer screening participation (Carcaise-Edinboro & Bradley, 2008; Ho, Lai, & Cheung, 2011). Increased time spent with the provider has been correlated with higher cancer screening participation levels (Carcaise-Edinboro & Bradley, 2008; Ho et al, 2011). Finally, risk/benefit discussions and the patient—provider relationship are included as variables in the shared decision-making process and the proposed model because they are identified as influential factors in other types of cancer screening (Dominick et al, 2003; Ye et al, 2009).…”

Section: Literature Review and Empirical And/or Theoretical Support Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research

Carter‐Harris

Davis

Rawl

2016

Res Theory Nurs Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To describe the development of a conceptual model to guide research focused on lung cancer screening participation from the perspective of the individual in the decision-making process. Methods Based on a comprehensive review of empirical and theoretical literature, a conceptual model was developed linking key psychological variables (stigma, medical mistrust, fatalism, worry, and fear) to the health belief model and precaution adoption process model. Results Proposed model concepts have been examined in prior research of either lung or other cancer screening behavior. To date, a few studies have explored a limited number of variables that influence screening behavior in lung cancer specifically. Therefore, relationships among concepts in the model have been proposed and future research directions presented. Conclusion This proposed model is an initial step to support theoretically based research. As lung cancer screening becomes more widely implemented, it is critical to theoretically guide research to understand variables that may be associated with lung cancer screening participation. Findings from future research guided by the proposed conceptual model can be used to refine the model and inform tailored intervention development.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Empirical And/or Theoretical Support Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review and Empirical And/or Theoretical Support Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research

Carter‐Harris

Davis

Rawl

2016

Res Theory Nurs Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Provider and health care system variables have been shown to be related to the SDM process, SDM outcomes, and CRC screening [19, 48, 95–97]. Individuals with more frequent health care provider visits [95] and those who felt that they had adequate time with their provider [48] have higher rates of CRC screening.…”

Section: Overview Of the Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: A conceptual framework to guide research

Christy

Rawl

2013

Patient Education and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To develop a conceptual framework to guide research on shared decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among persons at average risk and their providers. Methods Based upon a comprehensive review of empirical literature and relevant theories, a conceptual framework was developed that incorporated patient characteristics, cultural beliefs, provider/health care system, health beliefs/stage of adoption, and shared decision-making between patients and providers that may predict behavior. Relationships among concepts in the framework, shared decision-making process and outcomes, and CRC screening behavior were proposed. Directions for future research were presented. Results Many of the concepts in the proposed framework have been examined in prior research. However, these elements have not been combined previously to explain shared decision-making about CRC screening. Conclusion Research is needed to test the proposed relationships and hypotheses and to refine the framework. Practice Implications Findings from future research guided by the proposed framework may inform clinical practice to facilitate shared decision-making about CRC screening.

show abstract

“…1,2 Yet AAs are screened for CRC less regularly than EAs, 1–3 despite evidence that screening decreases CRC mortality. 4 Assessments of CRC screening rates typically rely on self-reported screening data, 3,5–7 which may be problematic because self-reported data are burdened with estimates of screening rates that are larger than actual screening rates and estimates of time since last screening that are smaller than actual time since last screening. 8–22 These fallible estimations lead to incongruencies between patients’ self-reports of cancer screening and their objective cancer screening data (i.e., medical records).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting Incongruence between Self-reported and Documented Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Sample of African American Medicare Recipients

Manning

Burnett

Chapman

2015

Behavioral Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessments of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates typically rely on self-reported screening data, which are often incongruent with medical records. We used multilevel models to examine health-related, socio-demographic and psychological predictors of incongruent self-reports for CRC screening among Medicare-insured African Americans (N = 3740). Results indicated that living alone decreased, and income increased, the odds of congruently self-reporting endoscopic CRC screening. Being male and having greater number of comorbidities decreased, and having less than a high school education increased, the odds of congruently self-reported fecal occult blood tests. Living alone, age and income had the most robust effects across classifications into one of four mutually exclusive categories defined by screening status (screened/unscreened) and congruence of self-reports. The results underscore the clinical importance of gathering socio-demographic data via patient interviews, and the relevance of these data for judging the veracity of self-reported CRC screenings behaviors.

show abstract

The influence of physicians on colorectal cancer screening behavior

Abstract: Contact with physicians and the quality of this interaction are associated with screening behavior. Interventions to improve these provider-related factors may promote CRC screening.

Cited by 19 publications

References 33 publications

Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research

Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research

Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: A conceptual framework to guide research

Predicting Incongruence between Self-reported and Documented Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Sample of African American Medicare Recipients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About