2003
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2003.00017.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of pre‐irradiation on the predictability of in vivo UVA protection with a new in vitro method

Abstract: Overall, the results showed that pre-irradiation should not to be used for the assessment of UVA protection using this method. Furthermore, it can be assumed that normalizing the in vitro absorbance curves to the labelled SPF of the sunscreen will adequately take into account the photochemical behaviour of UV filters on the skin during sun exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Star‐rated sunscreens include UVA as well as UVB filters; however, it was found previously that the protection against free‐radical production in skin (measured using the ascorbate radical) afforded by sunscreens is relatively low (1). Sunscreens with a sun protection factor (SPF) rating of 20+ (indicative of UVB protection) were found to afford only 55% protection against free radicals, giving a calculated protection factor of 2, which is lower than reported UVA protection factors measured in vivo , as far as this information is available to the general public (2). The extent to which solar wavelengths other than UVB (classically linked with non‐melanoma skin cancers) are involved in the initiation and/or promotion of skin cancers remains to be conclusively established, and results from animal models continue to be confounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Star‐rated sunscreens include UVA as well as UVB filters; however, it was found previously that the protection against free‐radical production in skin (measured using the ascorbate radical) afforded by sunscreens is relatively low (1). Sunscreens with a sun protection factor (SPF) rating of 20+ (indicative of UVB protection) were found to afford only 55% protection against free radicals, giving a calculated protection factor of 2, which is lower than reported UVA protection factors measured in vivo , as far as this information is available to the general public (2). The extent to which solar wavelengths other than UVB (classically linked with non‐melanoma skin cancers) are involved in the initiation and/or promotion of skin cancers remains to be conclusively established, and results from animal models continue to be confounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A serial concentration of bacterial‐derived melanin was prepared in cream excipient from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. A layer of 2 mg/cm 2 melanin cream was applied evenly on quartz plate with presaturated finger‐cot, according to the procedure 22 . After the sample had been dried for 20 min, the transmission at the 360 nm was read by UV spectrophotometers (Shanghai Spectrum Instruments Company, Shanghai, China), and measurements were performed at three different positions on each plate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method, the effectiveness of sunscreens can be obtained by mixing them with polystyrene nanospheres in an aqueous suspension. There are some methods to obtain SPF that use layers of sunscreen (7,18,19), but in practical application the sunscreen molecules are distributed in the epidermis; there may be water on one side and biomolecules (proteins and lipid membranes) on the other side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro sun protection factor of the sunscreens is obtained using transmission spectra of the sunscreens ( I 8, 19). In this skincell-mimicking system formed by polystyrene nanospheres, using the fluorescence of nanospheres we obtained the apparent transmission spectra of the sunscreens.…”
Section: Apparent Transmission and Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%