2016
DOI: 10.5937/specedreh15-10090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of pressure compensation in the middle ear on the detection of distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Abstract: Cilj ovog rada bio je utvrđivanje uticaja kompenzacije pritiska u srednjem uvu na veličinu odgovora distorzionih otoakustičkih emisija (DPOAE) na frekvencijama od 1 do 6 kHz. Ispitivanje je obavljeno na 150 pacijenata, unutar pola i tri starosne grupe (2-15; 16-40; 41-71 godine). Pritisak u srednjem uvu je varirao od negativnog do pozitivnog (-329 do 195 daPa). Povećanje pritiska pri kompenzaciji za 1 daPa dovelo je do povećanja amplituda pri frekvencijama od 1.0, 1.3 i 1.6 kHz za 0,02, 0,03 i 0,02 dB SPL (de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the trans-tympanic pressure difference is corrected in compensation, an abnormal pressure difference still exists at the oval window. Our results on DPA and noise changes on pressure compensation were only partly similar to those of Karić et al. (2016) on 50 child participants; they found modest enhancement of DPA in low frequency bands (1.0, 1.6, and 2.0 kHz) but surprisingly increased noise in mid-frequency bands (2–4 kHz) which we did not.…”
Section: Role Of Pressure and Compensation In Dpoaesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the trans-tympanic pressure difference is corrected in compensation, an abnormal pressure difference still exists at the oval window. Our results on DPA and noise changes on pressure compensation were only partly similar to those of Karić et al. (2016) on 50 child participants; they found modest enhancement of DPA in low frequency bands (1.0, 1.6, and 2.0 kHz) but surprisingly increased noise in mid-frequency bands (2–4 kHz) which we did not.…”
Section: Role Of Pressure and Compensation In Dpoaesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Compensation effects are smaller in ears with actual NMEP than in ears with artificially induced NMEP ( Marshall, Heller, & Westhusin, 1997 ). In exhaustive literature searches (Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar), we found 35 studies combining middle ear dysfunction and DPOAE response in children, but within these, there were only 4 studies on pressure in children ( Hof, Anteunis, et al., 2005 ; Hof et al., 2012 ; Hof, Dijk, et al., 2005 ), 3 using TEOAEs, and only 1 using DPOAEs ( Karić, Djoković, Dimić, Slavnić, & Savić, 2016 ). The latter authors included 50 children aged 2 to 15 years and compared amplitude (distortion product amplitude [DPA]) and noise levels before and after pressure compensation; however, they did not report the analysis parameter of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%