2022
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of pride emotion on executive function: Evidence from ERP

Abstract: Background The current study examined the influence of positive “basic” emotions on executive function; there is limited evidence about the influence of positive “self‐conscious”emotions, such as pride, on executive functions processes. Methods Pride is a status‐related self‐conscious emotion and the present research explored the influence of pride on the subcomponents of executive function, using three experiments that adopted the digit size‐parity switching, N‐back, and dual choice oddball paradigms. Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this was due to a smaller amount of negative yet overt correlations, the insignificance of a considerably larger amount of positive relationships further presupposes that pride influence over exploration is negligible. It could also be postulated that exploratory decrement during surges of this emotion is a possibility given how pride as a unique positive emotion may be damaging for cognitive performance [3], of which exploratory behavior is a key aspect [4]. Yet, additional experimentation would be required to test such hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this was due to a smaller amount of negative yet overt correlations, the insignificance of a considerably larger amount of positive relationships further presupposes that pride influence over exploration is negligible. It could also be postulated that exploratory decrement during surges of this emotion is a possibility given how pride as a unique positive emotion may be damaging for cognitive performance [3], of which exploratory behavior is a key aspect [4]. Yet, additional experimentation would be required to test such hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on conservative effect size in the small–medium range (effect size of f = 0.32), at least 34 participants were required to achieve a power of 0.95. Based on previous research that used a similar visual working memory paradigm and employed a similar experimental design (Barker & Bialystok, 2019; Bi et al, 2022; Jackson et al, 2014; Zhou et al, 2021), we considered that 48 participants would be an appropriate sample size. All participants were right handed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed a 2 (green product type: self-interested vs. other-interested) × 2 (message framing: gain vs. loss) × 2 (anticipated pride: anticipated pride group vs. control group) mixed experimental design, where the first two independent variables were within-subjects variables while the third variable was between-subjects [10,56,75,76]. We performed a priori power analysis using MorePower 6.0 to calculate the minimum sample size [77]: η p 2 = 0.12 for interaction between three variables [78], power = 0.8, α = 0.05.…”
Section: Participants and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%