2012
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Prior Handling on the Effective CS-US Interval in Long-Trace Taste-Aversion Conditioning in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of microstates are treatable as free parameters for model fitting. While the lack of principles for the formation of microstates is an obvious problem, this assumption is especially problematic as conditioning in the laboratory can occur over delays of milliseconds or even 24 hr (Etscorn & Stephens, 1973; Hinderliter et al, 2012; Kehoe & Macrae, 2002). Presumably, the resolution of microstates evoked over delays of milliseconds is very different from those evoked over hours.…”
Section: Implicit Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of microstates are treatable as free parameters for model fitting. While the lack of principles for the formation of microstates is an obvious problem, this assumption is especially problematic as conditioning in the laboratory can occur over delays of milliseconds or even 24 hr (Etscorn & Stephens, 1973; Hinderliter et al, 2012; Kehoe & Macrae, 2002). Presumably, the resolution of microstates evoked over delays of milliseconds is very different from those evoked over hours.…”
Section: Implicit Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the animal does not know at what delay a reward will follow a cue on the first experience of the cue. Indeed, these delays can span five orders of magnitude (Etscorn & Stephens, 1973; Hinderliter et al, 2012; Kehoe & Macrae, 2002). As mentioned above, the data that are often taken as evidence of the existence of neural microstates show that these time representations remap when the delay changes (MacDonald et al, 2011; Mello et al, 2015).…”
Section: How Bad Is the Problem Really?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of microstates are treatable as free parameters for model-fitting. While the lack of principles for the formation of microstates is an obvious problem, this assumption is especially problematic as conditioning in the laboratory can occur over delays of milliseconds or even twenty four hours (Etscorn and Stephens, 1973; Hinderliter et al, 2012; Kehoe and Macrae, 2002). It is unclear what, if any, principles govern the formation of microstates in the brains of real animals over spans of five orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Implicit Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the animal does not know at what delay a reward will follow a cue on the first experience of the cue. Indeed, these delays can span five orders of magnitude (Etscorn and Stephens, 1973; Hinderliter et al, 2012; Kehoe and Macrae, 2002). As mentioned above, the data that are often taken as evidence of the existence of neural microstates show that these time representations remap when the delay changes (MacDonald et al, 2011; Mello et al, 2015).…”
Section: How Bad Is the Problem Really?mentioning
confidence: 99%