1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0315-5463(81)72929-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Processing Parameters on Food Protein Functionality I. Differential Scanning Calorimetry as an Indicator of Protein Denaturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
147
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
22
147
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ΔH D represented the extent of the ordered structure of a protein. [22] Thus, the data suggested that the extent of the ordered structure of Yak solution was gradually increased with the molecular weight. It was suggested that the endothermic peak of the gelatin in the DSC profile was mainly caused by the protein denaturation or the disruption of hydrogen bonds between protein and water.…”
Section: Uv-vis Absorption Spectra Of Gelatinmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The ΔH D represented the extent of the ordered structure of a protein. [22] Thus, the data suggested that the extent of the ordered structure of Yak solution was gradually increased with the molecular weight. It was suggested that the endothermic peak of the gelatin in the DSC profile was mainly caused by the protein denaturation or the disruption of hydrogen bonds between protein and water.…”
Section: Uv-vis Absorption Spectra Of Gelatinmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Changes associated with absorption or evolution of heat in the sample cause a differential heat flow, which is recorded graphically as a thermogram. DSC has been employed to study effects of heatinduced phase transitions of starch and protein systems [3,4]. Heat changes associated with such transitions are measured and related to functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPF samples showed a endothermic peak (∆H = 4.92 ± 0.5 J/ g protein) around 89.3± 0.7 o C, which is in line with other values reported for pea protein denaturation temperature Shand et al 2007;Kozhevnikov et al 2001). The CPI sample did not show a distinguished endothermic peak, which is reported by more authors for other commercial pea protein isolates (Arntfield and Murray 1981;Shand et al 2007;. The absence of endothermic peak in the CPI indicates that the sample is already denatured during previous processing, whereas the SPF sample is still in their native state.…”
Section: Functional Properties 3421 Protein Transition Statesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Overall, this protein fractionation method uses chemicals (acids and bases) and high drying temperatures to allow complete disentanglement of the original structures and extract the individual components. However, pH and the heat treatment are linked to a loss in (native) protein functionality (Arntfield and Murray 1981;Taherian et al 2011;Wang and Corredig 2011;Denmat et al 1999), and negative impact on the environment Schutyser and van der Goot 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%