The influence of professional competence on the inter‐ and intra‐individual esthetic evaluation of implant‐supported crowns in the anterior maxilla

Petsos, Hari; Trimpou, Georgia; Eickholz, Peter; Lauer, Hans–Christoph; Weigl, Paul

doi:10.1111/clr.12819

Cited by 7 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this case, the difference between the two studies and the present study is probably due to the fact that two first molars were included in the present study, whereas Nickles et al and Rossberg et al did not include any molars. The fact that patients are more satisfied with the outcomes than the clinical parameters might possibly suggest (Petsos, Trimpou, Eickholz, Lauer, & Weigl, ) also seems to apply in this study (CRC: 71.22% vs. 93.33% for minimum satisfied patients). Nevertheless, it can be concluded for both studies that the patients were satisfied with the final results after 10 years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

Clinical and patient‐centred long‐term results of root coverage using the envelope technique in a private practice setting: 10‐year results—A case series

Petsos

Eickholz

Raetzke

et al. 2020

J Clinic Periodontology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Evaluation of long-term results after connective tissue graft (CTG) using the envelope technique and the effect on patient-centred outcomes (Oral Health Impact Profile: OHIP) in a private practice setting. Materials and Methods:Fifteen patients (11 female, mean age: 45.0 ± 8.88 years) underwent root coverage procedure using a CTG involving maxillary Miller class I teeth. Pre-operatively, 3 and 120 ± 12 months after surgery, all patients were examined, completed OHIP questionnaire, and were asked to assess improvement and their satisfaction with the results of surgery. All procedures were performed by the same investigator.Results: Recession depth at 3 months of 1.19 ± 0.93 mm was reduced to that of 0.63 ± 0.64 mm at 120 ± 12 months after surgery (p = .117). Recession width (−1.23 ± 2.27 mm) decreased as well (p = .117), while relative root coverage increased from 48.46 ± 32.18% at 3 months to 71.22 ± 30.86% at 120 months (p = .011). The number of cases with complete root coverage increased from two (15.4%) to six (40.0%) from 3 to 120 months (p = .046). OHIP score (12.07 ± 10.15) did not change after 10 years (12.13 ± 9.86, p = .889). Ten years after surgery, 12 patients (80%) reported they would make the decision again to undergo CTG transplantation. Conclusions:Within the limitations of the study design with a high risk of bias in a practice setting, long-term stability of recession reduction, OHIP and patient-perceived satisfaction remained stable over 10 years. K E Y W O R D Sconnective tissue graft, envelope technique, Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), patientcentred outcomes, root coverage | 373 PETSOS ET al.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

Clinical and patient‐centred long‐term results of root coverage using the envelope technique in a private practice setting: 10‐year results—A case series

Petsos

Eickholz

Raetzke

et al. 2020

J Clinic Periodontology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This leads to the question: how are professionals' and patients' esthetic evaluations of single tooth implant‐supported crown related ? Only a handful of studies have investigated this and, among these, even less have performed a correlation between the two evaluations ().…”

Section: Relationship Between the Patient's Subjective And The Profesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other authors suggest that the reason why the subjective evaluation is significantly more favorable than the objective evaluation might be related to different perspectives of observation. The patients' self‐assessment is performed using a mirror, whereas the pictures evaluated by dentists had been taken using retractors that held the lips back, forcibly exposing the peri‐implant soft tissues .…”

Section: Relationship Between the Patient's Subjective And The Profesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Esthetic evaluation and patient‐centered outcomes in single‐tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area

Stefanini¹,

Felice²,

Mazzotti³

et al. 2018

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Criteria for successful implants, in the rehabilitation of a single missing tooth in the esthetic area, should be determined by composite outcomes, including functional and esthetic aspects of soft tissues and the reconstruction, as well as patient-reported outcomes. This paper focuses on current methods in esthetic assessment and patient-centered/reported outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area. The relationship between subjective, patient-based esthetic evaluations and objective, professional-based esthetic evaluations is reviewed. In spite of increasing interest in the assessment of 'success' in implant dentistry, it is not yet possible to provide evidence-based conclusions because of the lack of consensus on a universal implant-supported crown esthetic index. There is also a need to standardize reporting of patient-centered outcomes in partially edentulous patients treated with implants.

show abstract

“…Misje et al, 21 Kourkouta et al, 22 Krenmair et al, 23 and Candel‐Marti et al 24 used the VAS scale. Tymstra et al 25 and Petsos et al, 26 with each using different customized questionnaires (CQ). Tymstra et al 25 used a CQ which comprised of an overall satisfaction score with a numerical range of 0 to 10; 0 = completely dissatisfied , 10 = completely satisfied .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mean VAS score in Misje et al 21 study was 8.8 out of a possible 10, making the converted PE score 88%. The custom questionnaire (CQ) used by Petsos et al 26 also used a 0 to 10 scale and the mean satisfaction recorded in their study was 8.9 (PE = 89%). Kourkouta et al 22 reported the results of their VAS scale in the form of a median percentage of 95%.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant‐supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone: A systematic review

Ramani

Bennani

Aarts

et al. 2020

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant-supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone by measuring the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Materials and methods: This systematic review follows the "Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols" (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Studies were searched in the databases Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the studies included in the review was scored using the GRADE system. The impact of the findings was analyzed by calculating effect size and standardization of results across different OHRQoL measurements was achieved by calculating the percentage equivalent. Results: A total of 13 studies were selected to be included in his systematic review after application of the inclusion criteria. A total of six studies recorded pre-and post-treatment OHRQoL results, while the remaining seven studies provided only post-treatment results. Conclusions: This review concluded that implant-supported fixed restorations in the esthetic zone have an overall positive impact on OHRQoL. However, patient satisfaction from this treatment reduced as the number of missing teeth replaced by implants was increased. Clinical significance: When implant-supported fixed restorations are being planned in the esthetic zone, dentists need to consider the patient's perception and the subsequent impact of these restorations on the patient's quality of life. Clinicians can be assured that patient OHRQoL will increase; however, clinicians should also keep in mind the importance of the gingival frame. Furthermore, they should be aware of the challenges when planning cases with larger numbers of implants in the esthetic zone as this could lead to a lowering of a patient QoL.

show abstract

The influence of professional competence on the inter‐ and intra‐individual esthetic evaluation of implant‐supported crowns in the anterior maxilla

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

Clinical and patient‐centred long‐term results of root coverage using the envelope technique in a private practice setting: 10‐year results—A case series

Clinical and patient‐centred long‐term results of root coverage using the envelope technique in a private practice setting: 10‐year results—A case series

Esthetic evaluation and patient‐centered outcomes in single‐tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area

Patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant‐supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About