2010
DOI: 10.17221/195/2009-cjas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of prolactin on bone mineral density (BMD) and some biochemical markers of ovariectomized rats

Abstract: ABSTRACT:A model of postmenopausal osteoporosis was used in the study. 107 days after ovariectomy the animals were subcutaneously applied 1.0 IU PRL/kg BM or 1.0 IU calcitonin/kg BM for 7 days in single doses. The application of the preparations started again 80 days after the first application. After 194 days the animals were narcotized, blood was collected, and lumbar (L2-L4) and femoral bones were prepared. The material obtained was subjected to densitometric analysis of bone mineral density (BMD). In ovari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model applied in this in vitro study is an excellent confirmation of recent reports about the regulating function of PRL on systemic calcium balance. The obtained results demonstrate that this hormone specifically regulates the systemic calcium The data here presented has been confirmed by recent research on a osteoporosis female rat model, where the protecting action of prolactin, estradiol and calcitonin on calcium balance was demonstrated [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The model applied in this in vitro study is an excellent confirmation of recent reports about the regulating function of PRL on systemic calcium balance. The obtained results demonstrate that this hormone specifically regulates the systemic calcium The data here presented has been confirmed by recent research on a osteoporosis female rat model, where the protecting action of prolactin, estradiol and calcitonin on calcium balance was demonstrated [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The addition of prolactin in concentrations of 100 and 300ng increased cellularity, but did not promote significant changes of the parameters that allow us to evaluate the osteogenic differentiation of MSC, which suggests that the prolactin perhaps stimulates more the proliferative activity than the osteogenic differentiation of MSC. However, it cannot be ruled out that the reduction of osteogenic differentiation of the MSC is one of the mechanisms responsible for bone mass reduction observed in periods of hyperprolactinemia of gestation and lactation, since that in vivo, the hyperprolactinemia may have an indirect effect on the osteogenic differentiation of MSC for reducing concentrations of estrogen, progesterone and gonadotropin hormones these that have direct action and positive about the osteogenic differentiation of MSC (Qu et al, 1998;Dolinska et al, 2010;Grachev et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological hyperprolactinemia that occurs during pregnancy and lactation has been associated to bone loss in women and animals (Zuni et al, 1999;Coss et al, 2000;Dolinska et al, 2010), with significant reduction of bone mineral density. The bone mass reduction observed in pregnant women varies from 2.1% to 9.4% in backbone; 0.9% to 3.9% in hip and approximately 2% to 4% in the radius (Karlsson et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%