The influence of recovery period following a pre-load stimulus on physical performance measures in handball players

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to establish the optimal recovery duration following a pre-load stimulus on performance measures related to handball players. Seventeen senior male University handball players (mean ± SD: age 23.6 ± 2.3 yrs., height 1.79 ± 0.06 m and body mass 72.5 ± 10.7 kg) performed three experimental sessions. All sessions consisted of a standardised warm-up followed by a pre-load stimulus (HSR) back squats followed by a passive rest for either 4-min (PAP4), 8-min (PAP8), or 12-min (PAP12). Following the completion of the passive recovery, players then performed a countermovement jump (CMJ), a 20-m linear sprint and a modified agility t-test. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. There was a significant main effect of passive rest duration after the pre-load stimulus. The PAP12 condition improved CMJ scores (2.3–2.6%; effect size = small), 20-m linear sprint times (3.3–3.7%; effect size = small to moderate) and agility times (1.6–1.9%; effect size = trivial) compared to PAP4 and PAP8 conditions (P < 0.0005). Values of heart rate and rating of perceived exertion were also significantly lower during the PAP12 condition compared to the PAP4 and PAP8 conditions (P < 0.0005). A positive Pearson correlation was established between agility and CMJ for all conditions (P < 0.001). The findings provide novel data observing that a pre-load stimulus, followed by 12-min of recovery, results in greater maximal jump, sprint and agility measures when compared with a 4-min or 8-min recovery in male handball players.

Lower limbs strength variations between injured and non-injured professional soccer players

“…Due to time constraints in our study, particularly in the professional team, we took into consideration a 30 s rest break between each jump performance. Shorter recovery durations, such as 20 s 32 and 30 s 33 between each repetition of the CMJ, have also been reported in several investigations. During testing, participants were urged to leap as high as possible.…”

Characterization of Static Strength, Vertical Jumping, and Isokinetic Strength in Soccer Players According to Age, Competitive Level, and Field Position

“…In our study, due to time restrictions to perform all the assessments in the protocol, especially in the professional team, we considered a rest period of 30 s between the performance of the jump. Some studies have also presented shorter recovery times such as 20 s [23] and 30 s between each repetition of the CMJ [24]. The data were collected using the Optojump Next (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) system of analysis and measurement.…”

Countermovement Jump Performance in Elite Senior Male Kabaddi Players: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Once this was done, the athletes were asked to perform the test with hands on hips and repeat this test 3 times, with a rest period of 30 s was provided in between each jump as previously described by Komi and Bosco (1978). They were instructed to execute the jumps using the correct technique, keeping their hands on their hips throughout the jump to minimize lateral and horizontal displacement and prevent any influence arm movements on jump performance (Ishak et al, 2022). Jumping height was measured as an estimate of the height change in the athlete's center of mass, taking into consideration the total duration the athlete spends in the air with no ground contact.…”