The influence of SBP amplification on the accuracy of form-factor-derived mean arterial pressure

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate assessment of mean arterial pressure (MAP) is crucial in research and clinical settings. Measurement of MAP requires not only pressure waveform integration but can also be estimated via form-factor equations incorporating peripheral SBP. SBP may increase variably from central-to-peripheral arteries (SBP amplification), and could influence accuracy of form-factor-derived MAP, which we aimed to determine. Methods: One hundred and eighty-eight patients (69% men, age 60 ± 10 years) undergoing coronary angiography had intra-arterial pressure measured in the ascending aorta, brachial and radial arteries. Reference MAP was measured by waveform integration, and form-factor-derived MAP using 33 and 40% form-factors. Results: Reference MAP decreased from the aorta to the brachial (−0.7 ± 4.2 mmHg) and radial artery (−1.7 ± 4.8 mmHg), whereas form-factor-derived MAP increased (33% form-factor 1.1 ± 4.2 and 1.7 ± 4.7 mmHg; 40% form-factor 0.9 ± 4.8 and 1.4 ± 5.4 mmHg, respectively). Form-factor-derived MAP was significantly different to reference aortic MAP (33% form-factor −2.5 ± 4.6 and −1.6 ± 5.8, P < 0.001; 40% form-factor 2.5 ± 5.0 and 3.9 ± 6.4 mmHg, P < 0.001, brachial and radial arteries, respectively), with significant variation in the brachial form-factor required (FFreq) to generate MAP equivalent to reference aortic MAP (FFreq range 20–57% brachial; 17–74% radial). Aortic-to-brachial SBP amplification was strongly related to brachial FFreq (r = −0.695, P < 0.001). The 33% form-factor was most accurate with high aortic-to-brachial SBP amplification (33% form-factor MAP vs. reference aortic MAP difference 0.06 ± 3.93 mmHg, P = 0.89) but overestimated reference aortic MAP with low aortic-to-brachial SBP amplification (+5.8 ± 4.6 mmHg, P < 0.001). The opposite was observed for the 40% form-factor. Conclusion: Due to variable SBP amplification, estimating MAP via form-factors produces nonphysiological inaccurate values. These findings have important implications for accurate assessment of MAP in research and clinical settings.

Associations between estimated and measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in older Black and White adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study

“…A minimum of two measurements was taken per participant, and the last two measurements were averaged. The validity and reliability of the automatic device for measuring PWV have been described previously [18] . Quality assurance for PWV included central training and recertification, quarterly equipment calibration, and ongoing quality control reviews by one of the authors (Tanaka H) on a stratified random sample of 40 records per month, with feedback provided to technicians.…”

Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity and All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study

“…MBP was calculated using a form factor of 0.4, rather than the traditional “1/3rd” approach, given that the derivation of MBP in previous ePWV equations utilized this same approach (“Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values’,” 2010 ). Use of 0.4 rather than 0.33 to calculate MBP is in keeping with changes in the pulse wave contour with advancing age and its relation to target organ damage ( Papaioannou et al, 2016 ; Schultz et al, 2020 ).…”

Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease

“…74 Slight improvement in accuracy of radial tonometry may be achieved by calibration with cuff BPderived mean arterial pressure and diastolic BP, 67 but this also has fundamental limitations and does not fully resolve calibration problems. 75,76 In seeking to develop better methods that are also more amenable to integration into daily clinical practice, the last decade has seen the field turned toward estimation of central aortic BP using cuff-based approaches with similar modes of operation to standard automated BP devices already in widespread use.…”