2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of sea ice and snow cover and nutrient availability on the formation of massive under-ice phytoplankton blooms in the Chukchi Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(109 reference statements)
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To describe seasonal variation in stage C3, we plotted concentrations (ind./m 3 ) in the upper and deeper layers (defined as samples with a maximum sampling depth of 200 m and samples from depth layers deeper than 200 m, respectively) per sampling day in three regions: north of 85°N and ≥200 km from the shelf (“northern Arctic basins”), 70–85°N and ≥50 km from the shelf (“southern Arctic basins”) and north of 70°N and <50 km from the shelf (“Arctic shelf and slope”). We defined the shelf as areas with bottom depth ≤500 m. We compared C3 concentrations to the growth season using daily mean phytoplankton concentrations in the upper 60 m from a pan‐arctic ice‐ocean‐biogeochemical model (Biology‐Ice‐Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System, BIOMAS) (Zhang et al., , , ). This included both pelagic phytoplankton and sea ice algae released to the water column (hereafter referred to as phytoplankton) given as mmol N/m 3 , which we converted to μg C/m 3 using the Redfield C:N ratio of 106:16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe seasonal variation in stage C3, we plotted concentrations (ind./m 3 ) in the upper and deeper layers (defined as samples with a maximum sampling depth of 200 m and samples from depth layers deeper than 200 m, respectively) per sampling day in three regions: north of 85°N and ≥200 km from the shelf (“northern Arctic basins”), 70–85°N and ≥50 km from the shelf (“southern Arctic basins”) and north of 70°N and <50 km from the shelf (“Arctic shelf and slope”). We defined the shelf as areas with bottom depth ≤500 m. We compared C3 concentrations to the growth season using daily mean phytoplankton concentrations in the upper 60 m from a pan‐arctic ice‐ocean‐biogeochemical model (Biology‐Ice‐Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System, BIOMAS) (Zhang et al., , , ). This included both pelagic phytoplankton and sea ice algae released to the water column (hereafter referred to as phytoplankton) given as mmol N/m 3 , which we converted to μg C/m 3 using the Redfield C:N ratio of 106:16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TED sea ice model has eight categories each for ice thickness, ice enthalpy, and snow depth. The centers of the eight ice thickness categories are 0, 0.38, 1.30, 3.07, 5.97, 10.24, 16.02, and 23.41 m [see Zhang et al ., ]. Thus the first category is actually the open water category, while the other seven categories represent ice of various thicknesses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a varying resolution regional model (minimum 4 km near the Alaska's coast), Zhang et al () found that under‐ice blooms in the Chukchi Sea increased in recent decades due to both increasing light availability related to reducing sea‐ice cover, and nutrient supply from the shelf break due to an intensifying circulation, which is weaker in coarse resolution models. Arctic ecosystem model intercomparison studies (Jin et al, ; Lee et al, ) also show that models with horizontal resolutions from 1 to 0.25°, and even higher for regional models, could simulate the mean states of the seasonal cycle of PP but with less variability compared to in situ observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%