1981
DOI: 10.4141/cjps81-027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE INFLUENCE OF SEEDING DATE AND SEEDING RATE ON SEED YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF FIVE GENOTYPES OF Brassica napus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
1
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
28
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand row spacing RS 3 was give maximum number of seed per pod while minimum number of seed per pod was found in RS 1 and was significantly different from each other as showed in table. These results are correlated with the findings of [14] and [15].…”
Section: Number Of Seed Per Podsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand row spacing RS 3 was give maximum number of seed per pod while minimum number of seed per pod was found in RS 1 and was significantly different from each other as showed in table. These results are correlated with the findings of [14] and [15].…”
Section: Number Of Seed Per Podsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The duration of pre-anthesis development was therefore more important than the duration of post-anthesis development in determining high yield. Other studies with different cultivars (Degenhardt and Kondra 1981) have also shown that there is no direct relationship between seed yield and the duration of flowering or seed formation. In B. juncea, a 15-60 days delay of sowing reduced the seed yield by 12-66% (Saini 1984).…”
Section: Phenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Kondra 1975, l9l7). Clarke and Simpson (1978) and Clarke et al (1978) suggested that higher yields could be achieved with increased rates of seeding, whereas studies conducted by Christensen and Drabble (1984) and Degenhardt and Kondra (1981) indicated seeding rates had no significant effect on yields. Crop heights were reduced with the two greatest seeding depths compared with the two shallowest depths (Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%