2003
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<0019:tiosfc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Several Factors Controlling the Interactions between Prince William Sound, Alaska, and the Northern Gulf of Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8a, b) Hence, magnitudes of the mean barotropic and baroclinic transports are comparable at MS, while the mean baroclinic transport at HE is about four times larger than at MS and, thus, about five times larger than the mean barotropic transport at HE. Moreover, comparison of the baroclinic transports through each layer indicates that inflow through one layer at HE is not balanced by outflow through the corresponding layer at MS; hence, significant vertical transport/mixing is expected inside the Sound, as confirmed in a previous study (Bang and Mooers 2003). Therefore, strong baroclinic flows through each layer are anticipated to have significant effects on the circulation in PWS.…”
Section: Annual Mean Transportsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8a, b) Hence, magnitudes of the mean barotropic and baroclinic transports are comparable at MS, while the mean baroclinic transport at HE is about four times larger than at MS and, thus, about five times larger than the mean barotropic transport at HE. Moreover, comparison of the baroclinic transports through each layer indicates that inflow through one layer at HE is not balanced by outflow through the corresponding layer at MS; hence, significant vertical transport/mixing is expected inside the Sound, as confirmed in a previous study (Bang and Mooers 2003). Therefore, strong baroclinic flows through each layer are anticipated to have significant effects on the circulation in PWS.…”
Section: Annual Mean Transportsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Previous numerical studies have indicated the importance of horizontal as well as vertical flow structure at HE and MS, with implications for the circulation pattern in the Central Sound and elsewhere in PWS (Bang and Mooers 2003;Bang et al 2005). Since a sustained observing system from surface to bottom and across the entire cross section at HE and MS is not available for determining flow and mass fields, volume and heat transports, etc., the present EPWS/NFS run provides a useful proxy and a unique opportunity to investigate how volume transports through the two straits are related to each other and what role(s) these two straits play in affecting the variability of circulation patterns inside PWS.…”
Section: Volume Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurements are in agreement with the seawater salinity at PWS found in literature. The reported PWS salinity values vary between 33.00 g L −1 in the middle of the sound to 20.00 g L −1 close to the shorelines, which receives freshwater run off (Gay and Vaughan 2001;Vaughan et al 2001;Bang and Mooers 2003;Li and Boufadel 2010). The ANOVA analysis showed that the salinities within the beach were significantly different from each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There were also talks on internal waves and the stability of models, and it was something of a coup to get permission to publish in the Journal of Physical Oceanography. One paper, by Bang and Mooers (2003), outlined a model of Prince William Sound and another, by Luyten et al (2003), the traditional area of the North Sea. This shows that specificarea models only were published in the Journal of Physical Oceanography, which was a shame and failed to reflect the breadth of papers presented at the conference itself.…”
Section: Advances In Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%