1932
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0110301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Sex on the Rate of Growth of Chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1933
1933
1962
1962

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carver and Hougan (1935) showed that in mass-mated White Leghorns, sex differences in the body weight are discernible at two weeks of age; while in Rhode Island Reds, according to Holmes et al (1932) these differences are marked at four weeks. Carver and Hougan (1935) showed that in mass-mated White Leghorns, sex differences in the body weight are discernible at two weeks of age; while in Rhode Island Reds, according to Holmes et al (1932) these differences are marked at four weeks.…”
Section: ) and Heterosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carver and Hougan (1935) showed that in mass-mated White Leghorns, sex differences in the body weight are discernible at two weeks of age; while in Rhode Island Reds, according to Holmes et al (1932) these differences are marked at four weeks. Carver and Hougan (1935) showed that in mass-mated White Leghorns, sex differences in the body weight are discernible at two weeks of age; while in Rhode Island Reds, according to Holmes et al (1932) these differences are marked at four weeks.…”
Section: ) and Heterosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With poultry, evidence has only lately accumulated on the influence of sex on growth rate. In group feeding experiments with chicks it has been demonstrated that pullets have a slower growth rate than cockerels(i,2l, 27,29,36,47). It would appear that the strict quantitative relationship varies within the species, but within breeds it is sufficiently exact to correct for sex differences in chick group-feeding trials where inequalities in sex numbers exist between groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%