1971
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1971.11514431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Shoot Competition on Fruit Retention and Cropping of Apple Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The overshadowing, both in the year preceding flower bud formation and in the current year, decreases the photosynthetic potential of the spurs by means of decreasing the specific weight of the primary leaves, the leaf area of the bourse shoots and the specific weight of these leaves. The bourse shoots arising from the dormant flower buds initially restrict the fruit setting and early fruit development within the system of the bearing spur, but later favor retaining of fruits, particularly at the June drop of fruitlets (100).…”
Section: Quality Of the Reproductive Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overshadowing, both in the year preceding flower bud formation and in the current year, decreases the photosynthetic potential of the spurs by means of decreasing the specific weight of the primary leaves, the leaf area of the bourse shoots and the specific weight of these leaves. The bourse shoots arising from the dormant flower buds initially restrict the fruit setting and early fruit development within the system of the bearing spur, but later favor retaining of fruits, particularly at the June drop of fruitlets (100).…”
Section: Quality Of the Reproductive Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of vegetative organs competes with fruit growth, and the removal of vegetative parts enhances fruit development (Quinlan and Preston, 1971;Matsui et al, 1978;García-Martínez and Beltrán, 1992). In pea parthenocarpy can be induced by severing the shoot just above the unpollinated ovary .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, pea (Pisum sativum) fruit development reduces apical shoot growth, and this effect is proportional to the number of growing fruits (García-Martínez and Beltrán, 1992), while reduction of vegetative growth by application of plant growth retardants (Davis and Curry, 1991) or mechanical elimination of apical and axillary shoots in grape (Vitis vinifera; Coombe, 1962) and apple (Malus domestica; Quinlan and Preston, 1971) favors fruit growth. In the case of pea, plant decapitation not only increases growth of pollinated ovaries but also induces parthenocarpic growth of unpollinated ovaries (Carbonell and García-Martínez, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%