1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70260-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of size or number of biopsies on rapid urease test results: a prospective evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Guell et al [9] advocated that a delayed test should be performed to rule out H. pylori infection. Laine et al [24] demonstrated that increase in size or number of biopsies could hasten the development of positive RUT. Siddique et al [10] reported that the sensitivity of RUT improved significantly when the gastric antral biopsy number increased from 1 to 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guell et al [9] advocated that a delayed test should be performed to rule out H. pylori infection. Laine et al [24] demonstrated that increase in size or number of biopsies could hasten the development of positive RUT. Siddique et al [10] reported that the sensitivity of RUT improved significantly when the gastric antral biopsy number increased from 1 to 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different ways to improve the sensitivity of the tests include: (i) increasing the urea concentration from 2 to 10% (41), (ii) incubating at a higher temperature (37°C) (287,595), and (iii) suppression of the buffer (15), while the size of the biopsy does not appear to be important (286,594). Unbuffered media have a limited shelf life (Ͻ5 days at 4°C) (406).…”
Section: Urease Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low specificity of the H. pylori ascertainment method may be explained, among other factors, by cross-reactivity with other non -H. pylori infections, by lack of detection of H. pylori in the biopsies (sample error; refs. [35][36][37][38], or by spontaneous eradication. Nevertheless, only a minority of infected individuals could eradicate the infection spontaneously (39), except when the development of gastric mucosal atrophy renders the gastric environment hostile to the bacterium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%