2015 Selected Problems of Electrical Engineering and Electronics (WZEE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/wzee.2015.7394046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of skin effect on the accuracy of eddy current energy loss calculation in electrical steel sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, s may not be constant throughout the sample volume, because the magnitudes of local B and H fields can differ in shape from point to point. However, if the sample is thin enough compared with the skin depth, which usually takes place for frequencies up to 400 Hz, it can be expected that the magnetic field is nearly uniform through the sample (as shown in [16]), and therefore the assumption seems justified then. Also assumption C2 is truthful for low enough frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, s may not be constant throughout the sample volume, because the magnitudes of local B and H fields can differ in shape from point to point. However, if the sample is thin enough compared with the skin depth, which usually takes place for frequencies up to 400 Hz, it can be expected that the magnetic field is nearly uniform through the sample (as shown in [16]), and therefore the assumption seems justified then. Also assumption C2 is truthful for low enough frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated upper‐frequency value for the test samples is 400 Hz. The method of its calculation is presented in [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the equation on specific eddy current loss is reduced to the classical form [9]. (8) where d is the lamination thickness (the smallest transverse dimension for the tangential magnetic flux).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major contributor to power loss of laminated transformer core is the joint area where the magnetic flux is redistributed and performed differently in comparison to uniform flowing. Understanding of the flux behaviour in the lamination joint area is a key requirement for a comprehensive analysis of the core magnetic properties [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%