“…It follows that individual features linked to high investment in offspring (reproductive potential) and strong commitment to children wellbeing (reproductive investment) would give a selective advantage to individuals in the process of mating choice (Geary et al, 2004). The choice of partner would therefore stem from considerations about elements associated to SES and social position as well as from attraction to physical characteristics concerning facial beauty and symmetry (Thornhill and Gangestad, 1993;Cornwell et al, 2006), height (Cavelaars et al, 2000;Silventoinen, 2003), hair and eye color (Frost, 2006;Swami et al, 2008), skin color (Hulse, 1967;Frost, 1994;Aoki, 2002), and other somatic traits linked to higher fitness. Accordingly, unhealthy individuals, especially those with evident signs of illness and malformation, would be negatively selected for marriage and, consequently, excluded from the reproductive process.…”