2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004223
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Socio-economic, Behavioural and Environmental Factors on Taenia spp. Transmission in Western Kenya: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Survey in Humans and Pigs

Abstract: Taenia spp. infections, particularly cysticercosis, cause considerable health impacts in endemic countries. Despite previous evidence of spatial clustering in cysticercosis and the role of environmental factors (e.g. temperature and humidity) in the survival of eggs, little research has explored these aspects of Taenia spp. epidemiology. In addition, there are significant gaps in our understanding of risk factors for infection in humans and pigs. This study aimed to assess the influence of socio-economic, beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological samples and demographic data were collected by weighted and stratified random sampling of 416 homesteads between August 2010 and July 2012 as part of a cross-sectional study of zoonotic infections in western Kenya[ 26 , 28 – 30 ]. Sera were analyzed to determine alpha- and flavivirus seroprevalence among children and adults.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological samples and demographic data were collected by weighted and stratified random sampling of 416 homesteads between August 2010 and July 2012 as part of a cross-sectional study of zoonotic infections in western Kenya[ 26 , 28 – 30 ]. Sera were analyzed to determine alpha- and flavivirus seroprevalence among children and adults.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land cover data [ 26 ] were created by classification of remotely sensed imagery, as described in Wardrop et al [ 29 ]. Spatial buffers of 1 km were created around each study homestead and the percentage of each land cover type (agricultural and grassland; flooding; flooding agricultural and grassland; swamp; woodland and shrubs; water bodies; vegetated) within each buffer was calculated using ArcMap 10 (ESRI, Redlands), to represent the landscape surrounding each homestead [ 29 ]. In addition, the Euclidean distances from each homestead to the closest water body and the closest area of flooding land were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first study was a community based cross-sectional study of humans and their livestock from 416 randomly selected homesteads between July 2010 and July 2012, during which questionnaire data were collected on a wide range of homestead and individual level risk factors for zoonotic disease, including meat preparation [29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%