2002
DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
107
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
107
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While we are aware of no study that has compared fine root production in mixed and monospecific forest stands, a number of investigations found a higher fine root biomass in mixed stands (Schmid 2002;Schmid and Kazda 2002); others, however, reported no differences or the opposite (Morgan et al 1992;Hendriks and Bianchi 1995;Hertel 1999;Bauhus et al 2000;Leuschner et al 2001;Bolte and Villanueva 2006). Most of these studies referred to twospecies stands, while species-rich forests have only rarely been investigated for their root systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we are aware of no study that has compared fine root production in mixed and monospecific forest stands, a number of investigations found a higher fine root biomass in mixed stands (Schmid 2002;Schmid and Kazda 2002); others, however, reported no differences or the opposite (Morgan et al 1992;Hendriks and Bianchi 1995;Hertel 1999;Bauhus et al 2000;Leuschner et al 2001;Bolte and Villanueva 2006). Most of these studies referred to twospecies stands, while species-rich forests have only rarely been investigated for their root systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was a significant relationship between pine fine root biomass and the C/N ratio in the soil organic layer ( Figure 3). Košir (1976), Kraigher (1997Kraigher ( , 1999, Kraigher et al (1996), Kutnar et al (2002), Leuschner & Hertel (2003), Murach (1984), Schmid (2002), Vilhar & Kraigher (1999) Temperate Pinus Helmisaari et al (2002, 2007), Mälkö nen (1974, Mamayev (1977Mamayev ( , 1986, Persson (1979), Vanninen & Mäkelä (1999) The fine root biomass of beech decreased with stand age and that of pine increased with stand age in the temperate zone ( Figure 4). There was one exceptionally old beech stand in the data.…”
Section: Stand Level Fine Root Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical stratification of beech and spruce fine root systems was found in the mixed stand due to a shift in beech fine roots from upper to lower soil layers (Bolte, Villanueva 2006). On the other hand, spruces had the shallower fine root systems in mixed stand (with beech) compared to pure spruce stand (Schmid 2002;Schmid, Kazda 2002). Rötzer et al (2009) found significant changes of above and belowground biomass of spruce and beech when temperature and radiation were increased additionally to decreased precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%