2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of spreading coefficient on carbonated water alternating gas injection in a heavy crude oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all of IFT tests, the CO 2 density was considered equal to that of pure CO 2 , and it was extracted from National Institute of Standards and Technology source data at both temperatures and desired pressures (''NIST, Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database'', 2014). (Riazi and Golkari 2016) Since the pure CO 2 density has a small difference with that of the CO 2 equilibrium with oil, this assumption does not make a considerable error in the results (Zolghadr et al 2013). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In all of IFT tests, the CO 2 density was considered equal to that of pure CO 2 , and it was extracted from National Institute of Standards and Technology source data at both temperatures and desired pressures (''NIST, Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database'', 2014). (Riazi and Golkari 2016) Since the pure CO 2 density has a small difference with that of the CO 2 equilibrium with oil, this assumption does not make a considerable error in the results (Zolghadr et al 2013). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reduction of oil‐water IFT by dissolution of CO 2 in water and oil has been reported by several researchers . While IFT reductions up to 20% were reported for oil‐brine systems, carbonated smart water has been reported to have 48% lower IFT compared to its non‐carbonated type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Approximately, 40 to 60 % of oil production rate has been attained with the utilization of the EOR technologies (Muggeridge et al, 2014). Water Alternating Gas (WAG) technology, which requires simultaneous injection of gas and water into the reservoir has been the most frequently employed EOR technology (Riazi and Golkari, 2016). However, early gas breakthrough, gravity override and viscous fingering constituted the main challenge in the WAG execution, and result to poor sweep efficiency over time (Qureshi et al, 2016).…”
Section: *Enhancedmentioning
confidence: 99%