2021
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1920710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Stigmatizing Messages on Danger Appraisal: Examining the Model of Stigma Communication for Opioid-Related Stigma, Policy Support, and Related Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, danger appraisal had a consistent, positive effect on public stigma. These findings aligned with previous findings based on cross-sectional data (e.g., Corrigan et al, 2003;Ledford et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2019) and demonstrated that danger appraisal is a critical mechanism to consider in understanding the emergence of public stigma based on exposure to stigmatizing communication. As noted in the literature review, interpersonal and mediated messages about health or other kinds of threats do not have to use stigma frames (e.g., see Dragojevic et al, 2014).…”
Section: Consistent and Fluctuating Influencessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Second, danger appraisal had a consistent, positive effect on public stigma. These findings aligned with previous findings based on cross-sectional data (e.g., Corrigan et al, 2003;Ledford et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2019) and demonstrated that danger appraisal is a critical mechanism to consider in understanding the emergence of public stigma based on exposure to stigmatizing communication. As noted in the literature review, interpersonal and mediated messages about health or other kinds of threats do not have to use stigma frames (e.g., see Dragojevic et al, 2014).…”
Section: Consistent and Fluctuating Influencessupporting
confidence: 89%
“… 73 Stigma may also undermine public support for naloxone: where naloxone recipients are perceived as dangerous, there may be less support for programs. 74 …”
Section: Meso Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Stigma may also undermine public support for naloxone: where naloxone recipients are perceived as dangerous, there may be less support for programs. 74 Stigma also has considerable influence on community support of other harm reduction efforts, including safe consumption facilities. For example, only 29% of US adults support legalizing safe consumption facilities, 75 and believe they would allow illegal activity and encourage people to use drugs, 76 with higher levels of stigma associated with lower support.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that many education programs do include a component about suicide, we think it is important to pause and ask how focusing on the possibility of injury and death is being received by participants. Ledford et al (2022) suggested there is an emotional response to stigmatizing messages, which increases the likelihood these messages are passed to others. The concept of suicide, while difficult, is intriguing and discussions around it may be more memorable to participants, thereby reinforcing the stigma of dangerousness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%