1991
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90374-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of surface finish and strain hardening on near-surface residual stress and the friction and wear behavior of A2, D2 and CPM-10V tool steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the three types of surface machining stresses as proposed by Parrish [10], the existing RS correspond rather to type III, thus, representing the ideal case of surface residual stresses, which can be attributed to the obviously good lubrication by the vegetable oil [14] and the avoidance of heat generation. The RS results are in good agreement with studies by Poggie et al [13]. In order to enable comparison of fatigue behavior of the specimen with the high RS to "stress-free" specimens it was tried to eliminate the RS.…”
Section: Residual Stressessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the three types of surface machining stresses as proposed by Parrish [10], the existing RS correspond rather to type III, thus, representing the ideal case of surface residual stresses, which can be attributed to the obviously good lubrication by the vegetable oil [14] and the avoidance of heat generation. The RS results are in good agreement with studies by Poggie et al [13]. In order to enable comparison of fatigue behavior of the specimen with the high RS to "stress-free" specimens it was tried to eliminate the RS.…”
Section: Residual Stressessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The extent of the reduction was dependent on the volume of the material removed. Poggie et al [13] claimed that the decreased RS "result from subsequent layers of material being removed in a non-abusive fashion". Thus, underlying material without significant RS is then exposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 'more tensile' residual stress at the surface in the transverse (grinding) direction would be expected [41][42][43]; however, the higher maximum tensile residual stress in the longitudinal direction is contrary to previous work [41,42]. This may be a result of the need to balance the surface compressive residual stress; this change of sign near the surface in the longitudinal direction has also not been reported in other work.…”
Section: Residual Stress Profiles After Grindingcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The residual stress as a representative of hardness is originally induced by the following sources:  Martensitic transformation below the surface  Plastic flow of material on the surface and the adjacent zones as a result of thermal stresses which are caused by heat generation during grinding operation  Plastic deformation at the workpiece surface due to the forces of abrasive grits (Barbacki, Kawalec et al 2003, Balart, Bouzina et al 2004). Plastic deformation beneath the surface is actually generated by characteristics of grinding, such as grit size, process parameters, and material properties (Poggie and Wert 1991). As AISI1045 steel used in this study, has low hardenability due to low percentage of carbon, and the material removal condition were not excessive in contact zone, it seems too hard to reach a martensitic microstructure.…”
Section: Metallographic and Hardness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%