2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of target erosion on the mass spectra of clusters formed in the planar DC magnetron sputtering source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a groove depth of 3.8 mm. Stop of the cluster formation long before the erosion groove reaches the target thickness was also observed for other experimental conditions and materials [2,5].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds to a groove depth of 3.8 mm. Stop of the cluster formation long before the erosion groove reaches the target thickness was also observed for other experimental conditions and materials [2,5].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The erosion can be roughly characterized by the total energy dissipated in the discharge [2]. Thus, we consider the product of the discharge power and time as the target lifetime measured in kWh (kilo-watt hours).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many factors contribute to the particle size, including the erosion profile of the target, the processing parameters (buffer gas flow rate, sputtering power or pulse frequency, deposition rate, cooling liquid, chamber pressure), as well as the distance from the sputtering gun to the aperture. [19][20][21][22] Yamamuro et al 23 discovered that keeping the gas flow rate relatively low produces narrow size distributions in asdeposited nanoparticles. They attribute this to the prevention a)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of the aggregation length and the depth of the race-track are both supposed to trigger the formation of larger clusters. 25,38 Nevertheless, during the experiments, some uncommon size evolutions are observed. Figure 4 shows the combined influence of the increasing aggregation length and the depth of the race-track on NP size for two groups of experiment with significantly different backing plate thicknesses (0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%