2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-017-3299-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of task Demands, Verbal Ability and Executive Functions on Item and Source Memory in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is generally associated with difficulties in contextual source memory but not single item memory. There are surprising inconsistencies in the literature, however, that the current study seeks to address by examining item and source memory in age and ability matched groups of 22 ASD and 21 comparison adults. Results show that group differences in source memory are moderated by task demands but not by individual differences in verbal ability, executive function or item memory. By c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), employers’ ratings were based on more than memory specificity, as opposed to the ABM study. Overall, it could therefore be suggested that both studies analysed here may be generally more supportive than other previous studies of episodic recall in autism, even in the designated ‘unsupportive’ conditions (see Semino et al, 2018, for similar findings for object recognition and source memory). It is therefore possible that our paradigms were already sufficiently supportive, reducing the necessity to recruit executive functions during recall, including for example the overall limited use of open questions, the provision of printed question sets (in the employment interviews supportive condition) and clear recall parameters for participants (V-VP diagram in the ABM supportive condition).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…), employers’ ratings were based on more than memory specificity, as opposed to the ABM study. Overall, it could therefore be suggested that both studies analysed here may be generally more supportive than other previous studies of episodic recall in autism, even in the designated ‘unsupportive’ conditions (see Semino et al, 2018, for similar findings for object recognition and source memory). It is therefore possible that our paradigms were already sufficiently supportive, reducing the necessity to recruit executive functions during recall, including for example the overall limited use of open questions, the provision of printed question sets (in the employment interviews supportive condition) and clear recall parameters for participants (V-VP diagram in the ABM supportive condition).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Understanding the mechanism behind ASD memory difficulties could be the basis for building strategies to support the different impaired domains (Semino, Ring, Bowler, & Gaigg, 2018). Since several aspects of visuospatial processing have been found to be preserved in children with ASD, interventions based on vision have been developed to support these children in different areas (Schopler, Mesibov, & Hearsey, 1995;Ganz, 2007).…”
Section: Visual Memory Profile In Children With High-functioning Autismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bennetto et al 1996 ; Bigham et al 2010 ; Gaigg et al 2014 ; Minshew and Goldstein 1993 ; Ring et al 2016 ), spatial (e.g. Bowler et al 2014 , 2004 ; Cooper et al 2015 ; Ring et al 2015 , 2016 ; Semino et al 2017 ) or other types of context information (e.g. Hala et al 2005 ; Lopez and Leekam 2003 ; Maister et al 2013 ; O’Shea et al 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%